Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office, his administration has set the economy right at the top of its agenda. Against all odds, the GDP has risen, and is expected to grow by 8 percent this year. However, little of this is trickling down to the general public and the poverty gap has widened. According to the latest Cabinet figures, there is a 66-fold wealth disparity in Taiwan this year, an all-time high.
In 2008, those in the top 5 percent of the income pyramid enjoyed, on average, an annual income of NT$4.5 million (US$140,530). The bottom 5 percent only earned an average of NT$68,000. In 1998, the highest incomes were only 32 times more than the lowest.
Unemployment shot up as a result of the financial crisis and the salaries of those who managed to keep their jobs fell. Middle and low-income earners were hit badly, but the fat cats were left sitting pretty. Now that the economy is improving at an encouraging 8 percent rate, we are still not seeing a concomitant increase in salaries. To exacerbate the situation, commodity prices have been rising, pushing up the price of goods on the shelf. Middle and low-income workers are, therefore, being hit with a double whammy.
The culprit is evidently the triangular trade model in which orders are received in Taiwan and the goods manufactured in China. The percentage of trade carried out in this way has risen from 13 percent in 2000 to 50 percent in June this year. As a result, exporters and their shareholders, not the general public, are seeing the fruits of this economic growth. The poor struggle to make ends meet and the rich continue to get richer on the back of the labors of the poor.
This problem has been worsened by a big cut in inheritance, business and income taxes. Instead of investing the resulting surplus in productive industries, the rich have been speculating in real estate, pushing property prices higher. The cost of a home in Taipei City now equates to more than 11 years of salary for the average employee. People who don’t already own a home have no hope of ever owning one, and this hopelessness is fueling popular resentment.
A widening income gap has many undesirable results. It is generally accompanied by increasing disparity between regions, especially between urban and rural areas. These two factors chase one another, forming a vicious cycle. Second, upward mobility is slowed down or choked off completely. People with lower incomes despair of ever improving their lot. Such people feel trapped and exploited, leading eventually to grave social crises. The recent wave of resentment toward big business is a sign of this growing discontent.
One of the roles of government is to uphold social justice by distributing the fruits of economic development. The Ma administration stresses economic growth, but only the rich are gaining from it. Meanwhile, the middle and working classes are feeling increasingly exploited. Now that Taiwan and China have signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), working people in Taiwan face even more direct competition from Chinese commodities and labor.
The government’s economic policies have just added fuel to the fire. The more the government pushes for economic growth, the more working people feel they are losing out relative to the wealthy minority. The income gap is creating an M-shaped society in which the middle class is eroding. The result is a loss of social cohesion and a breakdown of consensus that supports the existing social order. As the state loses its moral authority, we are likely to see growing discontent and social unrest. The ever-widening income gap will be an important issue in the November special municipality elections. If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government fails to deal with this issue, it could face a major upset at the polls.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS