Formosan ignorance
It is a pity the movie Formosa Betrayed is ending its tour of Taiwan soon.
Even more of a pity is how the general public seem unaware that the movie is being shown in Taiwan. While the film did have a small budget of US$8 million, raised mostly through donations, I am amazed by the lack of talk about the film in the Taiwanese media.
I imagined the media would scramble over this work. This film could help people discover what Taiwan is or what the identity of Taiwan is like, but most of the media was silent. Few people knew about it, and even fewer were actively spreading knowledge of the movie by word of mouth.
Of course, it can easily be seen why the movie was not widely reported: Most media outlets are pro-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or have a non-Taiwan-centric view. The few that did report on it do not have a wide circulation. If one knows about the general politics of Taiwan, this is obvious.
This film is a major step toward open dialogue about the past 70 years of Taiwan’s history. The White Terror, the repression felt by the Taiwanese under the KMT, the events of Feb. 28, 1947, and the killings of Taiwanese professors overseas were, until recently, taboo subjects. Other than numerous books, a few documentaries and anecdotes traded by family members, I have not seen much discussion of the era. Even official documents concerning this period for the most part are still censored and unavailable to the general public.
The attitude displayed by the government, or at least most media outlets, is a “hush-hush” attitude that was typical of the White Terror/KMT period of rule. It is very obvious if one knows about the development of the movie.
If forcing Will Tiao (刁毓能) and the crew of Formosa Betrayed to film their movie in Thailand was not enough, then what about the obvious lack of support from the government for the production of the Hollywood-style movie, which had to be funded through donations.
I urge the people of Taiwan to watch Formosa Betrayed. This is not politically motivated, but historical, as it is perhaps a first step toward opening up about our dark past. The best time for discussion is when the people that lived through that period are still alive, much like the veterans of World War II. Once lost, Taiwan will suffer a blow to its historical identity.
JEFFREY TSAI
Taipei
Values at odds
Apropos your report by Loa Iok-sin on the attempt by an environmentalist group to purchase up to 1,000 hectares of land in Changhua County to prevent the construction of a petrochemical plant (“Activists look to buy another 800 hectares of land,” Aug. 21, page 2), perhaps you could send another staff reporter to ask the Miaoli County farmers what they think of the fact that, whereas 50,000 people are apparently prepared to act to save birds and pink dolphins, none of these people were similarly prepared to help save them and their farms from expropriation. Shame on these environmentalists.
To hold up a bird or a dolphin as of greater value than another human being — which is the only calculation that could possibly account for the comparative inaction of these 50,000 people when the Miaoli farmers were having their land stolen by the government — does not bode well for the future of Taiwan. Such people had better not dare to speak of “human rights” in my presence.
Is it not also very ironic that the tactic which these people have adopted — the purchase of land — itself presupposes the integrity of the principle that property be privately owned, ie, the very principle that these people stood back and watched the Miaoli County government trample upon just a few months back?
For shame — and may it stick to their souls like petroleum and never wash off.
MICHAEL FAGAN
Tainan
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS