Taiwan has many problems, not only with its economy, but also with its democracy and identity. In the past two years, Taiwan’s economy has gone nowhere but down under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九); his “6-3-3” promise is at best a nationwide joke. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), from its one-party state days up to the present, still controls the Legislative Yuan.
For this reason, it maintains tremendous leverage and its possession of stolen state assets can go unchallenged, so the KMT can continue to place party interests before Taiwan’s national interests.
Or put another way, the KMT only protects Taiwan’s interests if they protect the KMT’s interests. This is the root of Taiwan’s problems and what Taiwanese still have not yet grasped. The KMT is a carpetbagger party that exists to serve its carpetbagger interests and preserve the constitutional fantasy that perpetuates its carpetbagger rights.
Carpetbaggers? Yes, that word is a pejorative term dating back to the post-US Civil War reconstruction period. It depicts those northerners who went south for their own advantage. However, the word has taken on additional meaning today; it applies to any outsiders, especially politicians, who as opportunists and exploiters seek a position or success in a new location.
Today in Taiwan, the pejorative sense of the word not only still applies, but it has an ironic twist. In the US, the carpetbaggers were the victors in a Civil War; in Taiwan, the carpetbaggers were the losers, and they were coming to a land that had nothing to do with that Civil War.
The KMT carpetbaggers’ long history is well known. They started coming to Taiwan and began exploiting the land and the Taiwanese after Japan lost World War II in 1945. Leading them was Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) appointed and greedy governor Chen Yi (陳儀). For the next 40-odd years, the carpetbaggers enjoyed the protection of martial law in Taiwan as all key government positions went to KMT loyalists.
The lifting of martial law and the later disbanding of the Garrison Command took away the carpetbaggers’ muscle, but that was not enough. The Legislative Yuan and National Assembly still contained KMT members elected in China in 1947 who had come to Taiwan for refuge and new opportunities.
Death got rid of some of those 1947 carpetbaggers, but it was the Taiwanese Wild Lily protests in 1991 that helped to get rid of the larger slew. Because of those protests, and as an effort toward democracy, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) forced those elected in 1947 to finally resign 44 years later, but that still was not enough.
At this point, do not make the mistake and say all waishengren are carpetbaggers. Many waishengren who fled China seeking a better life in 1949 were killed, tortured and/or imprisoned on Green Island; they suffered under Chiang and his successors just as much as Taiwanese.
To distinguish a carpetbagger, one must look at their positions, who financed their degrees, who groomed them for one-party state office, how they benefited from stolen state assets, their attitude toward that land across the Strait that the KMT lost in its Civil War.
Furthermore, what are their attitudes to the outdated 1947 Constitution that not only claims that Tibet, Mongolia and Xinjiang still belong to the Republic of China, but justifies the raison d’etre of their carpetbagger positions? How do they feel about Taiwan as Taiwan? Taiwan’s current president claims that he does not recognize the People’s Republic of China, yet he allows its flag to be flown in Taiwan and takes down Taiwan’s flag. Where is his heart?
The Legislative Yuan remains full of KMT carpetbaggers protecting their own party interests. In the last elections, the KMT candidates received some 54 per cent of the vote, yet because of gerrymandering, they were able to gain 75 per cent of the seats; do they use that majority to benefit Taiwan or themselves? Because of the KMT majority, the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement has never been subject to true national scrutiny.
With the November elections approaching, now is the time for Taiwanese to awaken their consciousness; now is the time to finish the process and finally get rid of the carpetbaggers who dream of a different land and who seek to perpetuate the carpetbagger privilege.
Though the KMT still possesses a large monetary political war chest from ill-gotten gains, in a democracy they can be voted out, one by one, position by position. Only when this is done and when all the KMT carpetbaggers are gone will Taiwan have a chance at wholeness, identity and a true imagined community.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taiwan.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s