Tears can be a potent tool in a politician’s toolkit. They can be especially effective when caused by an event or an issue that deeply resonates with the public. A perfect example was demonstrated by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), when, in the wake of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, he cried as he visited the ravaged areas.
His watery eyes captivated the hearts of the Chinese and further fortified his image in China as “Grandpa Wen.”
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) also has a reputation as a man who is driven to tears. Ma appeared to choke back tears when he watched Lust, Caution (色戒), an espionage thriller that explores an intricate, tangled web of love, hatred and lust.
The corner of his eyes glistened during an inspection visit to Tainan County in the wake of Typhoon Morakot, not because of the typhoon victims’ plight, but because of old pictures on a wall showing his long-time idol, the late president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國). Ma also often becomes emotionally wrought whenever the stage is set for him to commemorate Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙).
The latest appearance of the president’s tears came on Saturday, when he addressed the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) convention. Lambasting the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration for missing many opportunities — ones he felt were critical to Taiwan’s continued development — Ma, emotionally stirred, said: “I feel like shedding tears whenever I think of how it undermined the country.”
While it is nice to see a politician welling up and showing a softer side, the events that have prompted Ma to shed a tear are somewhat bewildering. His tears appeared out of place and ill-timed in the case of the movie and the discovery of Chiang’s photos.
To also show such emotion for Sun — granted he was the founder of the Republic of China (ROC) — is a bit of an overkill considering he has been dead for almost 90 years.
The tears streaming down Ma’s face during his speech at the KMT convention were not becoming of a man who is the head of state, but rather they resembled a grizzled politico who only knows how to point fingers at others and to divert attention from the real issues at hand.
Indeed, Ma’s tears would find more resonance with the public and enable him to come closer to being a man of the people if they were shed over more substantial events or issues, such as the plight of the Morakot victims, the farmers in Dapu (大埔), Miaoli County’s Jhunan Township (竹南), who stood helplessly by as the Miaoli County Government’s excavators demolished their rice paddies, or the potential health risks posed to residents of Yunlin County’s Mailiao Township (麥寮) as the result of a naphtha cracker complex nearby.
A genuine display of tears from the president demonstrates to the public that he is not apathetic to their suffering, but when his tears are shed out of place they only engender the public’s disgust. It’s time for Ma to dry his eyes and provide some concrete accomplishments before he has everybody in the nation crying over his administration’s pathetic showing.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS