The administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is working overtime to sell the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) it concluded with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to the US. Over the past few weeks, several think tanks and academic institutions, such as George Washington University, have hosted seminars on the topic, singing the praises of the ECFA and highlighting its benefits.
On Wednesday, Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) made an appearance at the American Enterprise Institute. She not only painted a rosy picture of the ECFA, but also claimed that the Ma administration has transformed a tense and often confrontational and provocative situation into one of peace and stability. If only it were that easy.
While it may be true that the PRC has been less threatening to Taiwan during the past couple of years, this is perhaps because the leaders in Beijing feel that the Ma administration is leading Taiwan in their direction. This position negates the key point that China has not reduced its missiles aimed at Taiwan and has continued its military buildup. So who is kidding whom?
Lai also seemed to believe that the ECFA would reduce Taiwan’s isolation in the international community and that Taiwan would be able to establish extensive free-trade agreements with other countries in the Asia-Pacific region.
“This is a decision for Taiwan to make, because we are a WTO member,” she said.
However, when news of a possible trade agreement with Singapore surfaced a day later, China insisted that this could only be done with its blessing, under the “one China” principle.
Another interesting statement made by Lai was that “the Republic of China is a sovereign and independent country. This is an established fact, which mainland China cannot deny.”
The problem is that under the Ma government’s definition of the “Republic of China,” China (or the “mainland”) is part of the ROC. Over the past few decades, confusion has been caused by the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) claim to govern all of China. If the Ma government really wanted to resolve the decades-old problem, it would urge China to accept Taiwan as a friendly neighbor and end its anachronistic claims to sovereignty over Taiwan, instead of blurring the sovereignty conflict by claiming it doesn’t exist.
Lai also bravely urged China to end its military deployment and renounce the use of force in trying to resolve differences. However, developments elsewhere show that China is all too eager to resort to force if things don’t go its way: The repression in Tibet and East Turkestan are highly illustrative of the frame of mind of the leaders in Beijing. Their military and political coercion of Taiwan, while urging quick agreements that integrate the cross-strait economies, suggests that they have an end game that conflicts with Taiwan’s democratic way of life.
During the past couple of months, we have observed fresh examples of the lack of willingness on Beijing’s part to be a responsible stakeholder. On the Korean Peninsula it has done very little to rein in North Korea, to the point where that country is now threatening a “physical response” to joint military exercises by the US and South Korea. In the South China Sea, it has shown such belligerence and aggressiveness that at last month’s ASEAN Regional Forum meeting in Hanoi, 11 Asian countries and the US expressed deep concern.
So, are these developments grounds for the rosy optimism displayed by Lai in Washington? It would be good if Lai would wake up and come back to the real world.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS