One month into the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), Taiwan’s public is still hearing two sides of the story, with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration continuing its efforts to sugarcoat the benefits of the agreement, while the opposition continues to push for a referendum for Taiwanese to decide whether they want the agreement to come into effect.
Before being elected, Ma came up with a rosy blueprint for Taiwan’s future, promising a “6-3-3” goal, which stands for 6 percent economic growth each year, annual per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate lower than 3 percent by 2012. Two years on from his election, last year’s economic growth turned downward to minus 1.87 percent, the unemployment rate reached its peak at 6.13 percent in August last year (it is currently 5.16 percent) and per capita income also dropped to US$17,927.
Now with the ECFA, the Ma administration once again is boasting about the various benefits Taiwan would gain after the inking of the pact, saying that the nation’s GDP will rise from 1.65 percent to 1.72 percent, and that export growth of approximately 5 percent and some 263,100 jobs will be created as a result. In addition, it will also help attract foreign direct investment in Taiwan.
Looking back, the fact that Ma failed to deliver on his election promises makes one wonder whether the ECFA dream may well become another set of empty promises.
One example is the claim that the ECFA will make it easier for Taiwan to sign free-trade agreements (FTAs) with other countries. While Chinese officials, as recently as Tuesday, have stated that they will not object to Taiwan having “trade relations with other economies,” Chinese Vice Minister of Commerce Gao Hucheng (高虎城) stated that his government continued to oppose any FTAs between Taiwan and other countries. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs has made similar comments earlier as well.
Another interesting sign that things are not as rosy as portrayed by the Ma administration is the recent joint report by the legislature’s Oragnic Law and Statute Bureau, pointing out that the ECFA could lead to an “economic siege” and threaten Taiwan’s sovereignty. The Ma administration has clung to the assertion that the ECFA is merely economic and no political issues are involved. If China’s ultimate goal is to absorb the island and is using the ECFA as a stepping stone, how nonpolitical is the agreement?
When asked about the different interpretations and perceptions — China’s political agenda and the Ma administration’s economic goals — Charles Freeman of the Center for Strategies and International Studies speaking at a seminar at George Washington University on Tuesday, responded that “you can sleep in the same bed and have different dreams, as long as they both have a good night of sleep.”
The problem is that China is the elephant in the room, and when it shares the same bed with a mouse, one can be certain that the mouse will have a hard time closing its eyes — it has to work hard not to be squashed.
If the Ma administration continues to daydream about the positive impact of the ECFA in Taiwan, then the matter may turn out to be a nightmare because China’s economic leverage and undemocratic proximity will squeeze out Taiwan’s democracy and hard-earned freedoms. The Taiwanese people will need to wake up to this reality and let their voice be heard before it is too late.
Jean Wu is a graduate in diplomacy and international relations from Seton Hall University in New Jersey. She works at the Formosan Association for Public Affairs in Washington.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS