President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is both president of Taiwan and chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). When it comes to the so-called Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), which he has yet to fully explain to the Taiwanese public, he seems to be favoring the latter role. He recently bundled off former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) to Beijing on his behalf to speak with Ma’s counterpart, Chinese President and General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Hu Jintao (胡錦濤). Wu’s remit was to convey Chairman Ma’s gratitude and to report his successful reconstruction of the party-state system, meaning he not only has his party, but also the public, under his thumb. Shades of Chairman Mao (毛澤東), surely?
Ma is happy to send politicians without any official position on official errands while he himself orchestrates affairs. His version of a China policy is essentially allowing his party to become a political appendage of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, doing the bidding of the Chinese communists. His out-of-hand rejections of petitions for a referendum on the ECFA, signed by hundreds of thousands of people, and the ECFA’s smooth passage through the legislature by a band of yes-men and women, are an affront to democracy in Taiwan.
Ma says the ECFA has nothing to do with politics, but General Secretary Hu did nevertheless extend a massive hand to him through his minion Wu, bringing up the possibility of further CCP-KMT cross-party talks. Hu said the ECFA showed the possibility of the two parties moving forward on cross-strait relations, based on a shared political foundation of opposing independence for Taiwan and adhering to the “1992 consensus.”
Hu also brought up the “one China” principle, and in doing so effectively introduced a political element into the ECFA. If Ma disagrees with Hu’s interpretation here, he ought to come forward and openly denounce it, or the ECFA will be forever associated with this political condition.
Instead, Ma and Wu simply appeal to the so-called “1992 consensus,” a cooked-up interpretation of the situation that betrays Taiwan’s sovereignty, showing precious little regard for Taiwan’s democracy. They believe that the KMT represents Taiwan, and say that the two-party high-level exchanges are indispensable to the furthering of cross-strait relations.
Beijing wants to characterize the “Taiwan question” as a residue of the old civil war fought between the Chinese Nationalists — the KMT — and the Chinese Communists, and is trying to wrest sovereignty from Taiwan. Whether or not Taiwanese give up their sovereignty to China is something that only they can decide: Taiwan’s democracy and future are not for the CCP or KMT to decide for their own mutual benefit.
If Ma truly has the public’s interests at heart he should be sincere with them. He seems to get all hot under the collar whenever the opposition questions his actions. Surely he can’t be stupid enough not to realize that this is precisely what an opposition party is supposed to do. The government’s responsibility is to lay out their plans and explain what they are doing, clearly and concisely, should any objections be raised.
In order to neutralize Hu’s political characterization of the ECFA, Ma should make the minutes of the negotiations available to the legislature and announce once and for all that there are absolutely no political preconditions, or secret understandings, behind the ECFA. Finally, the ECFA should be decided by a public referendum. The KMT have already shown themselves to be an appendage of the CCP, so they are no longer qualified to represent Taiwan.
James Wang is a political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS