Last weekend, I visited some friends in Yunlin. Leaving Taipei, the scenery along the highway gradually changed from densely populated residential areas to large paddy fields that had just been harvested. Any traveler would be happy to see rolling fields of green as they pass by, but the owners of this land want these fields to be turned into land for construction because they see it as a way to get the cash rolling in. From this perspective, it is difficult to understand why farmers in Dapu Borough (大埔), Miaoli County, have recently protested the expropriation of their land.
Nobody would believe that Taiwan could face a food shortage, especially when they see all the different varieties of foods available.
As wheat, corn and bean production decreases around the world, so long as farmers are willing to plant rice, we can be sure that we will at least have rice to fill our stomachs, even if we can’t buy food at high prices on international markets.
However, all hardworking farmers are not necessarily altruists who want to provide food for everyone. Many of them perhaps have no other choice but to make a living through agriculture. Therefore, when discussing whether we should protect agriculture, keep farmland, or give extra assistance to farmers, we would perhaps be able to arrive at a more objective view if we put ourselves in the shoes of other people.
Farmland expropriation in Dapu does not revolve around a single issue. It also involves the way in which the government overlooked public opinion when the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) was signed, as well as the dissatisfaction that was caused when the Rural Revitalization Act (農村再生條例) was passed.
I am sure most people would be quite happy if they could sell off a piece of farmland for a price several times higher than the going market rate.
However, land expropriation involves the government forcing land owners to sell their land at a rate decided by the government.
Those unwilling to have their land expropriated worry about disrespecting their ancestors, and they also worry about whether the compensation offered by the government will be adequate to support their families.
The ECFA early harvest list added 18 agricultural products that will receive tariff-free treatment when exported to China.
However, will the farmers who produce other agricultural products benefit from this? Will the NT$150 billion (US$4.7 billion) compensation that was part of the Rural Revitalization Act really reach rural districts and farmers?
If the government’s planned policies do not offer reasonable compensation to those affected and are not implemented smoothly, even more protests could follow. The government’s claim that they followed “standard procedure, and so had no softer approach” in the expropriation of farmland shows a lack of empathy toward farmers.
The government did nothing to help the situation and only served to further infuriate the farmers.
I have a friend who wants to find about 200 hectares of farmland to plant lychees for export. At a time when most people do not hold high hopes for agriculture, this should be encouraged by the government. However, my friend has had to work alone and without government help trying to find people to assist him in purchasing and renting land.
The government cannot wait to tear up rice fields about to be harvested, showing complete disregard for agriculture. In the case of my friend, the disregard is due to the fact that lychees make a far smaller contribution to the economy than wafer foundries and panel production.
A few friends in Yunlin form a complete supply chain for the sale of animal feed, breeding, slaughtering and processing. They often make more than NT$100 million in annual income, which shows that agriculture is not necessarily as bad as people believe it to be. In addition, they also enjoy the sort of freedom that can only be enjoyed by living in rural districts.
A diverse society should protect the rights of people to work in all types of industries and respect different lifestyles.
Without farmland there can be no agriculture, without agriculture there will be no farmers and without farmers, we would have no rural districts.
The government should take the agriculture issues that lie behind the farmland expropriation seriously.
Lei Li-fen is a professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
RSS