In 2005 a documentary was released portraying the plight of some of Taiwan’s farming communities, focusing in particular on a community in Tainan County’s Houbi Township.
These simple, unassuming men and women, with their self-deprecating sense of humor, have not had it easy over the years, having had to put up with constant government interference against a backdrop of ever harsher economic realities as Taiwan’s fortunes decline. They have accepted their throw of the dice, their attitude captured by the sentiment Let it Be (無米樂), also the title of the documentary. They fully recognize the fact that theirs is a dying breed. The documentary was a commercial success, showing just how much ut nostalgia modern city-dwellers have for the traditional way of life of bygone times. People were thinking, “Ah, yes, those were the days, but they’re gone forever, they’re a thing of the past.”
But has agriculture really disappeared? It is certainly true that it is in decline, clear from the small numbers of people working in the sector, and by how little it contributes to the national GDP. While people in the cities live out their day-to-day lives preoccupied with politics and money, there are still farmers toiling away in the fields cultivating the land, the people of the townships around the island planting rice day in and day out, as they have done for decades.
They keep soldiering on despite the meager profits, with the price of rice stagnant, resolute in the assertion that this is a way of life that they have chosen. Their memories are inextricably linked with the land they cultivate, and in which they are emotionally invested. This is why they have remained on the land even until today.
The government used to say that it had a policy of cultivating industry with agriculture and developing agriculture with industry, but the reality is it has concentrated almost entirely on the first half of that formula. The policy of allowing fertilizer to be exchanged for grain as part of land reforms artificially suppressed the price of rice, and the Agricultural Development Act (農業發展條例) introduced planned fallow of land as a precondition for entry into the WTO.
More recently, there has been the forced appropriation of farmland in Dapu Borough (大埔), Miaoli County, and now we have the Rural Revitalization Act (農村再生條例). Is it really right for the majority to forcibly divest the weak and vulnerable of something that gives meaning to their lives? Farmers have devoted their lives to Taiwan and yet we demand more from them, down to their last shred of dignity.
People who have worked the land from dawn till dusk have now been forced to come to Ketagalan Boulevard to stage an overnight protest against the injustices levied against them. Taiwanese society is torn by fiercely opposed voices, but the passion behind the words expressed here is seated in the depth of emotion all of us feel for this land of ours.
Land is inextricably linked to meeting the fundamental needs of people. In the same way, people need memories to satisfy their most fundamental emotional needs. We believe in freedom of access to the land one grew up on and the memories invested there, and this path will lead to a future of mutual respect and understanding between different ethnic groups.
We therefore oppose this excessive and heavy-handed official intervention and call on the government to cease, with immediate effect, the forced expropriation of people’s land, and to amend the unfair laws that make such action possible. We give our full support to Saturday’s overnight protest outside the Presidential Office on Ketagalan Boulevard.
An open letter from the National Taiwan University’s Dalawasao Club.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS