In 2005 a documentary was released portraying the plight of some of Taiwan’s farming communities, focusing in particular on a community in Tainan County’s Houbi Township.
These simple, unassuming men and women, with their self-deprecating sense of humor, have not had it easy over the years, having had to put up with constant government interference against a backdrop of ever harsher economic realities as Taiwan’s fortunes decline. They have accepted their throw of the dice, their attitude captured by the sentiment Let it Be (無米樂), also the title of the documentary. They fully recognize the fact that theirs is a dying breed. The documentary was a commercial success, showing just how much ut nostalgia modern city-dwellers have for the traditional way of life of bygone times. People were thinking, “Ah, yes, those were the days, but they’re gone forever, they’re a thing of the past.”
But has agriculture really disappeared? It is certainly true that it is in decline, clear from the small numbers of people working in the sector, and by how little it contributes to the national GDP. While people in the cities live out their day-to-day lives preoccupied with politics and money, there are still farmers toiling away in the fields cultivating the land, the people of the townships around the island planting rice day in and day out, as they have done for decades.
They keep soldiering on despite the meager profits, with the price of rice stagnant, resolute in the assertion that this is a way of life that they have chosen. Their memories are inextricably linked with the land they cultivate, and in which they are emotionally invested. This is why they have remained on the land even until today.
The government used to say that it had a policy of cultivating industry with agriculture and developing agriculture with industry, but the reality is it has concentrated almost entirely on the first half of that formula. The policy of allowing fertilizer to be exchanged for grain as part of land reforms artificially suppressed the price of rice, and the Agricultural Development Act (農業發展條例) introduced planned fallow of land as a precondition for entry into the WTO.
More recently, there has been the forced appropriation of farmland in Dapu Borough (大埔), Miaoli County, and now we have the Rural Revitalization Act (農村再生條例). Is it really right for the majority to forcibly divest the weak and vulnerable of something that gives meaning to their lives? Farmers have devoted their lives to Taiwan and yet we demand more from them, down to their last shred of dignity.
People who have worked the land from dawn till dusk have now been forced to come to Ketagalan Boulevard to stage an overnight protest against the injustices levied against them. Taiwanese society is torn by fiercely opposed voices, but the passion behind the words expressed here is seated in the depth of emotion all of us feel for this land of ours.
Land is inextricably linked to meeting the fundamental needs of people. In the same way, people need memories to satisfy their most fundamental emotional needs. We believe in freedom of access to the land one grew up on and the memories invested there, and this path will lead to a future of mutual respect and understanding between different ethnic groups.
We therefore oppose this excessive and heavy-handed official intervention and call on the government to cease, with immediate effect, the forced expropriation of people’s land, and to amend the unfair laws that make such action possible. We give our full support to Saturday’s overnight protest outside the Presidential Office on Ketagalan Boulevard.
An open letter from the National Taiwan University’s Dalawasao Club.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
RSS