It is Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez’s biggest economic battle cry, and it is getting louder as Venezuela suffers a recession: “We’re going to bury Venezuelan capitalism.”
Yet creating a socialist economy is one of Chavez’s most elusive goals — a stark example of the disconnect between the president’s rhetoric and the reality on the ground. In fact, the private sector still controls two-thirds of Venezuela’s economy — the same as when Chavez was elected in 1998, according to estimates by the Venezuelan central bank.
The reasons are political and practical. Chavez knows most Venezuelans recoil from the idea of Cuban-style state control, and his government is far from being capable of taking over and running a majority of the economy.
“Basically he recognizes that in this day and age in a global economy ... complete state control would just doom the country,” said Michael Shifter an analyst at the Washington-based Inter-American Dialogue.
So his strategy has been to selectively nationalize companies, set up state-run supermarkets and promote worker-managed businesses, while trying to convince Venezuelans to accept his vaguely defined brand of “21st century socialism.”
It is a hard sell for a country hooked on consumerism.
Shopping malls are filled with middle and upper-class Venezuelans browsing through Lacoste shirts, Guess jeans and Montblanc pens. Sales have declined in the recession, but just about everyone who can afford it seems to own a BlackBerry, and Scotch whisky flows liberally in upscale restaurants at the equivalent of US$110 a bottle.
Just as Chavez has ramped up his anti-capitalism tirades, he finds himself facing one of the biggest scandals of his tenure involving a state-run food distributor. The company, PDVAL, left more than 2,700 shipping containers of rice, flour, milk, chicken, beef and other foods in a port rotting or long after their expiration dates.
Its former chief and two others have been arrested and some Venezuelans have begun to mockingly call the state company Pudre-val, using the Spanish word for rotting. One newspaper cartoon depicted Karl Marx wearing a gas mask to ward off the stench.
It’s a glaring example of the problems and delays that regularly plague Venezuela’s government-run operations.
In a review of 15 state-run companies, economist Richard Obuchi found that all “were producing well below goals or production capacity.”
The vast majority — some of which were nationalized by Chavez — now rely on government subsidies, said Obuchi, a professor at the Institute of Higher Administration Studies in Caracas.
One of the expropriated companies, industrial valve maker Industria Venezolana Endogena de Valvulas SA, has been limited to refurbishing old oil industry and water valves for years — instead of producing them as it once did.
Port workers in Puerto Cabello, where much of the rotten food was found, say six of the port’s eight cranes are out of order and the pace of importing cargo has slowed since the government took over management last year.
The country’s food imports have grown as the government has seized farmland and periodic shortages of foods, such as milk, beef and sugar have grown more frequent in recent years.
People at a state-supported farming commune on the outskirts of Caracas say they have been waiting for a new well to water crops for more than a year since the first one went dry.
While production has declined, the public sector has swelled from about 1.4 million workers in 1999 to about 2.4 million this year, according to government figures.
“They don’t have the capacity to manage any company,” said Rafael Davila Guaricuco, a 34-year-old port crane operator. “They’re destroying everything.”
That is precisely the perception Chavez tries to fight in his speeches.
“The bourgeoisie is trying to convince Venezuelans that the path to socialism isn’t viable, that all businesses in socialism go bust. It’s the opposite,” Chavez said.
He pitches cut-rate prices at subsidized state-run supermarkets like a salesman, and touts a successful state-run dairy factory, cooking oil plant and the nationalized telephone company.
State-run markets are part of Chavez’s attempts to counter 31 percent inflation that has been battering the country, alongside a recession that shrank the economy 5.8 percent in the first quarter. Venezuela is now the only South American country with a shrinking economy, according to the latest figures available.
Tensions are growing between Chavez and business leaders, who blame his policies for prompting a sharp drop in investment.
Chavez’s finance and communication ministers did not respond to e-mails seeking comment about his efforts toward socialism.
Since 2007, Chavez has nationalized and expropriated companies in sectors he deems strategic, including the oil industry, cement, telecommunications, electricity, steel and food. But economists note that those businesses make up a relatively modest share of the economy.
The balance between public and private sectors remains nearly identical to when Chavez took office in part because the private sector grew faster than the government between 2003 and 2006, when the economy was booming.
Last year the private sector accounted for 70 percent of gross domestic product, including 11 percent in taxes paid on products, according to the central bank’s estimates. The public sector was 30 percent, a slightly smaller share than when Chavez was elected in 2008.
By international standards, Venezuela has long had a large public sector because it includes the oil industry. By comparison, the public sector in Sweden accounts for 25 percent of GDP, and in US less than 14 percent.
Chavez could have moved more quickly toward bigger state control while the economy was growing, but he had other priorities, including consolidating his political power after a 2002 coup that ousted him for two days.
He now has a favorable congress and judges. But just as he turned to his socialist economic agenda, lower oil prices and the global economic crisis cut into the money he had to take over and run companies.
Polls have repeatedly shown Venezuelans oppose expropriations.
Chavez is now focused on maintaining his majority in September congressional elections and on his own re-election in 2012.
He has repeatedly said he would not use Cuba or the collapsed Soviet Union as an economic model, noting that even his mentor Fidel Castro has advised him: “Chavez, remember this isn’t 1960.”
Victor Alvarez, an economist and former mining minister for Chavez, said the aim is to build a new sort of “social economy” sector made up of worker-managed companies, farming cooperatives and other community-run businesses.
“The objective isn’t for the state to have the greatest weight in the economy, because that would be simply repeating the experience of 20th century socialism,” said Alvarez, who has been studying the transition to socialism at a government-sponsored research institution.
A plan prepared in 2007 by the government projected that such “social economy” businesses and the public sector would together become larger than the private sector by 2013.
Chavez knows he is still very far from that goal.
But Chavez says he won’t give up, using one of his favorite mantras: “We invent or we fail.”
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS