Representatives of Taiwan’s Pingpu Aborigines have filed a complaint against President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration with the UN Human Rights Council and they might now be given an opportunity to speak at the associated UN meeting. Given the plethora of human rights-related activities in the UN, these developments deserve our attention.
The UN system consists of more than 40 organizations that all deal with human rights issues. The first type of organization are the human rights groups based on the UN Charter and they are divided into general human rights monitoring organizations and specialized human rights organizations.
The former includes the UN General Assembly, the UN Security Council, the UN Economic and Social Council, the International Court of Justice and the UN Secretariat. The latter includes the UN Human Rights Council, which replaced the Commission on Human Rights a few years ago, the Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, the UN Commission on the Status of Women, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Center for Human Rights under the Secretariat.
This last group was established based on international human rights conventions, such as the UN Human Rights Committee, which was set up according to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that came into effect in 1976, the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, which was set up based on the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination that became effective in 1969, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, the Committee Against Torture; and the Committee on the Rights of the Child, as well as a group of three people who monitor the implementation of the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid.
At the moment, development, security and human rights are seen as the three main pillars of the UN system, with the elevated status of human rights requiring more prestigious UN human rights organizations and mechanisms. The General Assembly thus passed Resolution 60/251 to create the Human Rights Council on March 15, 2006. As an affiliate to the General Assembly, its status, authority, participants and rules are all regulated. The resolution repeatedly reaffirms that the work of the Human Rights Council must follow the principles of universality, objectivity, transparency, fairness and genuine dialogue.
For more than 60 years, Taiwan has been occupied and ruled by a foreign regime. China has used oppression and deceit to constantly destroy the Taiwanese national identity and turned them into orphans in the international community. Because the UN still has not handled the issue of Taiwan’s legal status, in flux since the end of World War II, it remains unresolved to this day. The UN has also shown precious little concern for the human rights of the people who reside here. Hopefully, the complaint filed by the Pingpu Aborigines will be given fair and just treatment by the UN.
Chen Yi-nan is a member of the Northern Taiwan Society.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS