The IMF recently revised upward global economic growth forecasts. This included an increase in the growth forecast for Taiwan to 7.7 adercent. The government was all over this news, using it as evidence that its promised “Golden Decade” was on the horizon. The pro-unification media also claimed the new figure meant that Taiwan’s economic growth rate was now higher than that of South Korea. They also said that this highlighted the poor record of the previous government. The problem is, this just isn’t true.
The seemingly healthy growth rate of 7.7 percent is the result of the economy bouncing back following a deep dip. If you look at it more closely, you see that Taiwan’s economic growth rate compares badly with that of South Korea or any of the other “Asian Tigers,” and we are not in as good a situation as one might expect from looking at the rate in isolation.
The truth of the matter is that, according to IMF statistics, Taiwan’s economic growth last year was minus 1.91 percent, South Korea’s was 0.2 percent and Singapore’s was 1.3 percent. IMF forecasts for this year forecast rates of 7.7 percent, 5.7 percent and 9.9 percent respectively.
At first glance, Taiwan seems to have done better than South Korea. However, if we look at 2008, the year the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won the presidential election, as a base of 100, then the 7.7 percent increase to this year gives a new index of 105.64. This is marginally worse than a comparable index for South Korea, at 105.95, and much worse than Singapore’s 108.47.
In other words, this apparently miraculous growth rate is simply the result of rebounding from a deeper trough than these other countries. There is nothing miraculous about it. On the contrary, it is proof that Taiwan’s economy has been buffeted more by external factors than other countries. This is because Taiwan has put all its eggs in one basket, and become far to reliant on one market — China.
IMF analysts seem to be aware of this vulnerability, which is why they also predicted a growth rate of only 4.3 percent for next year, lower than the 5 percent forecast for South Korea, 4.9 percent for Singapore and 4.4 percent for Hong Kong. What the IMF figures show clearly is that Taiwan’s economy isn’t really experiencing anything out of the ordinary.
If free-trade with China is a panacea for all our economic problems as the pan-blue camp maintains, then why after two years of opening up, greater deregulation and closer ties, is Taiwan falling behind? Every time a new measure is announced people carp on about investors’ newfound interest in Taiwan, wax lyrical about how the salmon are returning upstream to their place of birth, bleat endlessly about the stock market index sailing past 10,000 points with 20,000 points on the horizon.
How many people are going to fall for such “irrational exuberance?” Will the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) mean that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) so-called “6-3-3 policy” — annual GDP growth of 6 percent, annual per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of less than 3 percent — actually work? I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
At this stage, what we can say is that the IMF has rather more conservative expectations of the ECFA than some of its supporters in Taiwan. Otherwise, why would they have ranked us lower than the other Asian Tigers in their economic growth forecasts for next year?
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS