Recent developments in cross-strait relations, including expanded economic ties and a lessening of tensions, have lulled many in Taiwan into what may be a false sense of security. Vigilance is most often needed just at the point when one is tempted to let down one’s guard.
Taiwan has struggled for the past 60 years to achieve democracy, expand human rights and codify the rule of law. In doing so, it has emerged as an irreplaceable beacon of liberty for all within the Chinese cultural world and especially for those in communist China. Taiwan calls out to those Chinese yearning to breathe free. It also stands as an irrefutable answer to those who insist that authoritarianism in Beijing is the only way, because democratic values conflict with Chinese culture. The world, in short, needs Taiwan, especially as China rises.
I have been a stalwart defender of Taiwan and a proponent of vigorous adherence to the US’ Taiwan Relations Act, the cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations, ever since I first came to Congress over two decades ago. The Taiwan Relations Act has served to preserve Taiwanese identity through all of the cross-strait crises of the past 30 years. With the mutual commitment of the peoples of Taiwan and the US, it will continue to do so for decades to come.
I have introduced legislation in the current Congress to ensure the stipulation in the Taiwan Relations Act that Congress be a full partner in determining Taiwan’s defensive needs is fully adhered to. This can only be achieved by requiring regular consultations with the US State Department and Department of Defense on arms sales to Taiwan. Such Congressional oversight was standard operating procedure in the first decades after enactment of the Taiwan Relations Act, but has fallen into disuse over the past decade.
Recent press reports of an alleged freeze on arms sales to Taiwan, so as not to cause consternation in Beijing, is a cause of concern for all friends of Taiwan in the US. Former US president Ronald Reagan’s Six Assurances in 1982 expressly forbade any prior consultation with the Chinese Communist Party regime on such arms sales. The clearest means for the current administration in Washington to demonstrate that it is not kowtowing to Beijing on Taiwan’s security needs would be to make available to Taiwan’s Air Force the next generation of F-16 fighters, an action which I have long advocated.
While Taiwanese need to maintain vigilance to ensure they are not taken in by any wolf-in-sheep’s clothing, Washington can also ill afford to neglect the security of the Western Pacific. Recent crises, both domestic and foreign, have caused many in the US to avert their eyes from the continued political and economic developments taking place across the Pacific.
The recent torpedoing of a South Korean naval vessel by North Korea, however, served as a grim reminder that the Asia Pacific region, while emerging as the global economic hub, remains nonetheless a dangerous place. When Chinese missiles were fired over Taiwan more than a decade ago, the US fleet, including an aircraft carrier, was sent to reaffirm US commitment to regional stability. Now another US aircraft carrier should be dispatched on a similar mission to South Korean waters.
In this century of a rising Asia, the US can ill afford to cede political and economic influence in this vital region. That is why I have remained a firm advocate for swift Congressional action to ratify the free-trade agreement (FTA) with South Korea and that is why I have given equal voice to the need for the US Trade Representative to open, as soon as possible, discussions on a similar FTA with our friends in Taiwan.
Taiwan remains the sixth-largest market for US agricultural products and our 10th-largest trading partner. In other words, there is no way to go but up in expanding US-Taiwan trade relations, given the common values of two free-market economies with mutual respect for the rule of law. A Taiwan-US FTA would also further cement the close friendship that has existed between our two peoples for the past 60 years. The time has come. The time is now.
Countless ties bind the people and governments of Taiwan and the US. The alliance which has flourished under the Taiwan Relations Act will grow even stronger with a renewed commitment to its principles and to peace and stability in the Western Pacific.
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen is a ranking Republican on the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS