Over the last few days the temperature in Taiwan has shot up and the media has been awash with articles of how people can avoid the worst of the heat wave. The papers have also been full of stories about the number of heat-related deaths. Questions have been raised as to the potential health risks posed by the scorching heat, when in fact the best way to deal with this problem, and to reduce the health risks posed by climate change, is to establish some form of early warning mechanism.
Environmental protection and health professionals in Taiwan have for many years now taken the impact of global warming on health very seriously. The National Science Council (NSC) has also been aware of the problem for some time. National Taiwan University set up the Global Change Research Center (GCRC) a while back, and the NSC is funding academic research into the effect of climate change in Taiwan and what ecological changes are going to mean for people’s health, predicting how the situation is likely to evolve.
Over the last century Taiwan’s average temperature has increased by between 1.1 and 1.4 percent, twice the global average. The temperature of the surrounding oceans has risen at a higher rate, having a considerable impact on the fishing ecology.
Both excessively high and excessively low temperatures can have an impact on health. The West is more preoccupied with heat waves caused by global warming, but, for the time being at least, these will have relatively little effect on people in Taiwan because we are more used to living in a hot climate. On the other side of the coin, however, we are more vulnerable to drops in temperature.
The biggest threat posed by either high or low temperatures is the possibility of cardiovascular or respiratory diseases. Fatalities from these two types of disease have an extremely marked inverse relationship with temperature: The number of deaths caused by them is low during warm weather and high during the winter months for humans.
The optimum temperature is in the range of 25˚C to 29˚C. If it goes above 30˚C or below 20˚C the risk of deaths increases, but there is more to fear from the cold than the heat. If temperatures fall below 15˚C, the risk of death from either type of disease among the elderly shoots up by between 30 and 40 percent. Compare that with a less than 5 percent rise in the risk of fatalities with temperatures over 30˚C. In Taiwan, then, deaths are more likely to occur from a drop in temperature than from a hike.
So what can we expect from an increase in global temperatures in terms of how it will affect the well-being of the Taiwanese? We should expect fewer days of low temperature during the winter months and higher temperatures during the summer. As Taiwanese are more used to a hot climate, there will be a period of time when, because of the warmer winters, temperature-related deaths will fall.
According to figures released by the GCRC, however, by the summer of 2050, temperatures of more than 35˚C will become more frequent, and 40˚C or more will not be unheard of.
Taiwan’s population is aging, and by 2050 it is predicted that a quarter of the population will be elderly. Heat-related deaths are consequently also expected to rise, and to rise by a significant amount. The heat island effect caused by high rise buildings and high density clusters of buildings will make summer temperatures in Taipei soar above those felt in, say, Kaohsiung, and heat waves are going to hit Taipei residents much harder. We predict that beyond 2050 the number of heat-related deaths during the height of summer will be three or four times higher than at present.
The experience of Western countries in recent summers demonstrates how lethal heat waves can be. The lack of an adequate early warning system was a major contributing factor, but cities like London and Paris have learned their lesson and have established warning systems. The danger may not be imminent in Taiwan, but at some point we are going to have to think about implementing our own heat wave early warning system.
Sung Fung-chang is a professor and acting dean of the China Medical University College of Public Health.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS