Legislature must reject ECFA
Now the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) has been signed against the will of the people. Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) says the legislature has to vote to ratify or reject the ECFA in its entirety, without amending it article by article. Under the circumstances, the best choice for the legislature is to reject it, for several reasons.
The ECFA was negotiated in complete secrecy. If the ECFA were so beneficial to Taiwan, why did the government have to hide it from the people?
Most Taiwanese are opposed to the signing of the ECFA. Their request for a referendum on the deal was denied. A protest by 150,000 people in a rainy Taipei was ignored by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who went to the south instead. Representing the people, the legislature has an obligation to uphold the will of the people.
The ECFA was signed at gunpoint, with about 1,500 Chinese ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan. Such an “agreement” is not legitimate. What has happened to Ma’s promise not to sign any agreement with China when Taiwan is under threat?
After signing, even Ma admits that China ultimately intends to take over Taiwan in the post-ECFA era. He should also mention that China’s political intentions mirror Ma’s own intention of “eventual unification.”
The ECFA might improve cross-strait relations temporarily, but will lead to economic and political disasters for Taiwan eventually. Taiwanese themselves know much better about the effects of ECFA than the government-solicited foreign advisers did.
When Chinese Nationalists and Chinese Communists collaborate, it is not the time for celebration. Taiwanese have to unite to protect their democracy.
The legislature must exercise its power to reject the ECFA and hold a referendum instead.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Women are not property
I was disgusted with your decision to print Kenneth McCauley’s letter (July 7, page 8).
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel, a devotion not to any universal ethical principle but to something as arbitrary as one’s place of birth or the color of one’s skin. Such tribalism is ethically empty and beneath contempt.
So this “MC Hot Dog” feels “sick” when he sees Taiwanese girls dating Westerners? Well, perhaps he ought to be reminded that Taiwanese girls do not belong to him, nor are they the collective “property” of Taiwan or of that organ which purports to speak on behalf of a coerced population, the government. A woman’s choices are her own and a woman’s life is her own — whom she may or may not choose to date is none of his damn business, for she belongs to herself.
Xenophobia is no answer to perceived slights and criticism — and there is much criticism to be offered to Taiwanese people if they are to secure and advance their freedom in the future. The hallmark of Western culture and the scientific and technological progress it has offered the world has always been rational criticism; the irrational dismissal of all such criticism is, and has always been, the hallmark of despots, racists and those so sick of mind as to accept either one.
Yours contemptuously,
Michael Fagan
Tainan
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS