Taiwan and China are scheduled to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) during the fifth round of cross-strait talks today and tomorrow in Chongqing. In spite of the rosy pronouncements by Taipei and Beijing, this agreement is not about free trade, it is about political control.
The democratic opposition in Taiwan and the Taiwanese-American community in the US object to this agreement on several levels
First, the substance of the agreement. Instead of opening up Taiwan’s economy to the world, it links Taiwan to a very volatile and unpredictable Chinese economy, which is full of bubbles about to burst. Taiwan has numerous viable industries, but many people fear that, upon the signing of an ECFA, jobs will move to China — 1.6 million according to one account — and that cheap Chinese products will flood the market.
Second, the agreement is modeled after China and Hong Kong’s Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA), in which Hong Kong is clearly a territory of China. During the past year, the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has repeatedly referred to Taiwan as a “region” of China, while Beijing of course sees an ECFA as a step in its longer-term strategy to annex Taiwan.
An ECFA therefore clearly undermines Taiwan’s sovereignty and the ability of Taiwanese to determine their own future. To those of us who have worked hard for Taiwan’s democracy for many decades, this is unacceptable. If there is to be a trade agreement, it should be under the auspices and regulations of the WTO, of which both Taiwan and China are members.
Third, the process of approval: While the agreement will apparently be submitted to the Legislative Yuan, the Ma administration’s instinct is to bypass the legislature — as it effectively did with 12 previous accords. It remains to be seen whether the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated legislature will be a rubber stamp or whether it can really exercise its legislative oversight responsibility.
Another step undermining democracy in Taiwan was the rejection by the Ma administration earlier this month of a proposal by opposition parties to hold a referendum on the proposed ECFA during the November special municipality elections. The Taiwan Solidarity Union-proposed referendum would have asked: “Do you agree that the government should sign an ECFA with China?”
The answer to that question would give everyone concerned a clear and unambiguous answer where Taiwanese stand on this issue. Blocking it was an affront to democracy.
The net effect of an ECFA will be to push Taiwan closer to a still repressive China at the expense of freedom and democracy. Contrary to what some wishful thinkers in the US are saying, more economic interdependence between Taiwan and China will lead to less stability in the region, as it gives China more leverage to force its undemocratic ways on Taiwan.
The best way forward would be for the international community, including China, to accept Taiwan as a full and equal member in their midst. True long-term stability in the region can only be achieved if China gives up its unwarranted and anachronistic claims to Taiwan and honors the right of Taiwanese to decide their own future as a free and democratic nation.
Long-term stability in Taiwan itself can only be achieved if the KMT has the public’s well-being in mind and stops pining for the long-lost Republic of China. That “dream” is quickly becoming a nightmare that will inhibit Taiwan’s acceptance in the international community.
Bob Yang teaches at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, and serves as president of the Washington-based Formosan Association for Public Affairs.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS