In difficult economic times like these, one principle should be given the same prominence as the headline-grabbing issues of high deficits and austerity packages. That principle can be captured in just a few words: “Everyone must play by the rules.”
The global financial crisis has served to show that there is little tolerance these days for people who cheat. And, since the onset of the crisis, the G20 countries — with France (and the US) as driving forces — have been pressing for better regulation, governance and accountability. No safe havens for tax evasion. No safe havens for money laundering and terrorism financing and no safe havens for “cozy financial regulation.”
These principles are clearly what people in the developed world want to see enforced. In tough times such as these, money matters.
For the developing world, however, there is another dimension to the phrase “play by the rules.” People there want to see an end to the safe havens that allow corrupt officials to steal public money and stash it abroad. So we would add: no safe havens for the proceeds from corruption.
On the tax side, there has clearly been progress. France imposed on its banks strong transparency and reporting requirements for banking activities in tax havens, in addition to the international standard for information exchange.
Others have demonstrated leadership in pursuing companies that pay kickbacks and bribes to foreign officials. But recovering the billions of dollars stolen by corrupt leaders and officials in the developing world has so far proved to be a lengthy process.
The World Bank Group, together with the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, is working on the Stolen Asset Recovery initiative to go after corrupt gains and help spur action to return looted assets to their legitimate owners: the people of the affected developing countries.
France, the UK, Australia, Sweden, Norway and Switzerland all support this urgent agenda, and agree that impunity for this type of global crime can no longer be tolerated. Abuse of public authority for private gain is not acceptable.
These issues of tax havens, looted funds, bribery and corruption are at the nexus of the urgent need to foster openness and transparency in financial transactions, and to ensure accountability at the global level. Now is the time to build momentum and deliver lasting results.
Corruption — under any form or circumstance — is a cancer that cripples developed and developing economies alike. It undermines economic growth. It is a crime that produces particularly damaging consequences in the developing world.
By conservative estimates, every year around US$20 billion to US$40 billion is stolen from developing countries through bribery, misappropriation of funds and corrupt practices. The lost opportunities are enormous. In the developing world, US$20 billion could finance 48,000km of two-lane paved roads, or provide treatment for 120 million people with HIV/AIDS for a full year.
Success is possible. Switzerland repatriated US$684 million of former Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos’ money to the Philippines and US$700 million of General Sani Abacha’s funds to Nigeria, and, with other nations, returned to Peru more than US$180 million stolen by former government official Vladimiro Montesinos.
So, as world leaders convene at the G20 and other forums in the coming weeks to discuss the economic crisis, stimulus plans, financial regulation and development, the fight against corruption should remain a full part of the multilateral agenda. But not all G20 countries have yet ratified the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), which provides a framework for countries to develop their own laws to stamp out the use of safe havens for criminals stealing from the developing world.
The G20 has called for more forceful action against corruption. We must now go further. Countries that have not signed the convention should quickly do so. Those countries that have signed and ratified UNCAC now need to implement it.
Financial institutions should also not do business with non-cooperative jurisdictions — areas that don’t comply with the rules. Civil society should agitate for action and accountability. Fighting corruption is vital, not simply because it is the right thing to do, but because failing to do so affects us all.
We now live in a different world where developing countries are a fundamental source of growth, as well as being importers of capital goods and services from developed countries. When corruption hurts partners with that level of clout, it hurts you, too.
Christine Lagarde is France’s minister for economy, industry and employment. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala is the World Bank Group’s managing director.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
RSS