In difficult economic times like these, one principle should be given the same prominence as the headline-grabbing issues of high deficits and austerity packages. That principle can be captured in just a few words: “Everyone must play by the rules.”
The global financial crisis has served to show that there is little tolerance these days for people who cheat. And, since the onset of the crisis, the G20 countries — with France (and the US) as driving forces — have been pressing for better regulation, governance and accountability. No safe havens for tax evasion. No safe havens for money laundering and terrorism financing and no safe havens for “cozy financial regulation.”
These principles are clearly what people in the developed world want to see enforced. In tough times such as these, money matters.
For the developing world, however, there is another dimension to the phrase “play by the rules.” People there want to see an end to the safe havens that allow corrupt officials to steal public money and stash it abroad. So we would add: no safe havens for the proceeds from corruption.
On the tax side, there has clearly been progress. France imposed on its banks strong transparency and reporting requirements for banking activities in tax havens, in addition to the international standard for information exchange.
Others have demonstrated leadership in pursuing companies that pay kickbacks and bribes to foreign officials. But recovering the billions of dollars stolen by corrupt leaders and officials in the developing world has so far proved to be a lengthy process.
The World Bank Group, together with the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, is working on the Stolen Asset Recovery initiative to go after corrupt gains and help spur action to return looted assets to their legitimate owners: the people of the affected developing countries.
France, the UK, Australia, Sweden, Norway and Switzerland all support this urgent agenda, and agree that impunity for this type of global crime can no longer be tolerated. Abuse of public authority for private gain is not acceptable.
These issues of tax havens, looted funds, bribery and corruption are at the nexus of the urgent need to foster openness and transparency in financial transactions, and to ensure accountability at the global level. Now is the time to build momentum and deliver lasting results.
Corruption — under any form or circumstance — is a cancer that cripples developed and developing economies alike. It undermines economic growth. It is a crime that produces particularly damaging consequences in the developing world.
By conservative estimates, every year around US$20 billion to US$40 billion is stolen from developing countries through bribery, misappropriation of funds and corrupt practices. The lost opportunities are enormous. In the developing world, US$20 billion could finance 48,000km of two-lane paved roads, or provide treatment for 120 million people with HIV/AIDS for a full year.
Success is possible. Switzerland repatriated US$684 million of former Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos’ money to the Philippines and US$700 million of General Sani Abacha’s funds to Nigeria, and, with other nations, returned to Peru more than US$180 million stolen by former government official Vladimiro Montesinos.
So, as world leaders convene at the G20 and other forums in the coming weeks to discuss the economic crisis, stimulus plans, financial regulation and development, the fight against corruption should remain a full part of the multilateral agenda. But not all G20 countries have yet ratified the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), which provides a framework for countries to develop their own laws to stamp out the use of safe havens for criminals stealing from the developing world.
The G20 has called for more forceful action against corruption. We must now go further. Countries that have not signed the convention should quickly do so. Those countries that have signed and ratified UNCAC now need to implement it.
Financial institutions should also not do business with non-cooperative jurisdictions — areas that don’t comply with the rules. Civil society should agitate for action and accountability. Fighting corruption is vital, not simply because it is the right thing to do, but because failing to do so affects us all.
We now live in a different world where developing countries are a fundamental source of growth, as well as being importers of capital goods and services from developed countries. When corruption hurts partners with that level of clout, it hurts you, too.
Christine Lagarde is France’s minister for economy, industry and employment. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala is the World Bank Group’s managing director.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
The election campaign for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair is heating up, with only 10 days left before party members cast their ballots on Oct. 18. The campaign has revealed potential strengths for the party going into important elections next year and in 2028, particularly the desire among leading candidates to deepen cooperation with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). However, it has also exposed the party’s persistent weaknesses, especially in formulating a policy on cross-strait relations that can appeal to the majority of Taiwanese. Six candidates are registered: former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), 73; former legislator Cheng Li-wun
RSS