It was this month 15 years ago that then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) visited his alma mater, Cornell University. In retrospect, the visit turned out to be a key development in US-Taiwan relations. It would be good to pause for a moment and reflect on the importance of that historic visit.
Lee had studied agricultural economics at Iowa State University in the 1950s, and — after an academic career and work with the Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction — returned to the US and received his PhD at Cornell in 1968. During this time, he was deeply influenced by developments in the US, observing the functioning of democracy up close.
After returning to Taiwan, he began to rise through the ranks, becoming Taipei mayor in 1978 and governor of Taiwan Province three years later. A skilled technocrat, he came to the attention of then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), who eventually made him vice president.
When Chiang passed away in early 1988, Lee was thrust into the limelight, becoming the first Taiwan-born president. In that position, he made the final push toward Taiwan’s momentous transition to democracy, ending the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款) in 1991, moving toward full elections for all seats in the Legislative Yuan in 1992 and bringing about Taiwan’s first-ever direct elections for president in 1996.
However, internal democracy in Taiwan was only his first objective. He also wanted to bring about an end to Taiwan’s international isolation, which was caused by the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) decades-long insistence that they were the rightful rulers of all of China. A small step in that direction would be a visit to his alma mater, Cornell University. Once he could visit his university, other doors would be opened, or so his thinking went.
From 1992 on, he and his government worked hard — both openly and behind the scenes — to bring a visit to fruition. Initially, this was nixed time and again by the old crowd in the US State Department, who wanted to preserve the legacy of Washington’s 1971 opening to China and had little feel for the democratic and international aspirations of Taiwan and its president.
However, in May 1995, then-US president Bill Clinton had to succumb to pressure from US Congress, which was much more in tune with Taiwan and its democracy. The resulting visit was in a sense rather uneventful — Lee gave a subdued speech, merely extolling Taiwan’s democratic achievements.
However, the leaders in Beijing saw it differently: They perceived Lee’s visit as a challenge to their goals of reining in and eventually absorbing Taiwan. They began the first missile crisis in the summer of 1995; to be followed in March 1996 by more missile firings designed to intimidate Taiwan’s electorate ahead of its first presidential elections. The Clinton administration responded to the provocations by deploying two aircraft carrier battle groups.
In spite of the threats, Lee was elected Taiwan’s first directly elected president, serving until 2000, when he was succeeded by the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Lee can thus be credited for completing the transition to democracy, started by the democratic opposition in the 1980s, and for laying the foundation for the peaceful transition of rule from the KMT to DPP in 2000.
While many international observers lauded the second change of political power in 2008 as evidence that Taiwan has become a democracy, we need to remember that Taiwan’s fledgling democracy is still young and relatively frail. Constant vigilance is warranted and we need to voice concern when basic human rights, justice and values of freedom and democracy are placed on a sliding slope.
China is continuing to threaten Taiwan’s existence as a free and democratic nation. Using the carrot of an economic cooperation framework agreement and the stick of its military might, Beijing will continue to try to influence political decision-making in Taiwan in its favor.
At this critical juncture, we need to remember the long road to democracy traveled and protect the legacy left by Taiwan’s democratic opposition and by a statesman such as Lee.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS