The looting of art and cultural treasures over the centuries, by explorers, archeologists, soldiers and thieves, has become something of a cause celebre in museums around the world in recent decades.
Think of the outcry over the Elgin marbles in London, the Pergamon gates and Nefertiti’s bust in Berlin. Anyone who visits Angkor Wat should think about all those hacked-off friezes and Buddha heads.
The National Palace Museum is currently promoting a special exhibition of Tibetan Buddhist treasures that opens on July 1. The museum boasts that the show will include 130 artifacts from China, dating from the 5th to the 20th century, including many “lent” by the Potala and Norbulingka palaces in Lhasa and important Tibetan monasteries such as Sakya, Palcho and Tashilhunpo.
A senior museum official said the exhibit will “display the superiority of Tibetan art.” The museum Web site says: “No doubt Buddhism has become the flesh and blood of Tibetan culture,” adding that it hopes the exhibition will “bring about a better understanding of Tibetan history and culture.”
Left unsaid in the promotional materials is that most of the buildings at Sakya were razed during China’s Cultural Revolution, while Palcho was partially destroyed during the 1959 uprising against Chinese rule. Tashilhunpo lost two-thirds of its buildings at the hands of the Red Guards, although as the seat of the Panchen Lama it fared better than most.
Will there be any mention of the other monasteries that were demolished — like the great university at Ganden — the hundreds of thousands of scriptures that were burned, the monks and nuns that were killed, imprisoned or forced out of their orders — or of the repression of religion that continues in Tibet and Tibetan areas today?
The Beijing government and Chinese nationalists complain loudly about the looting and burning of the Summer Palace by British and French troops in October 1860 and the subsequent dispersal of its treasures around the world. An attempt to auction two bronze animal heads from the palace early last year was thwarted by “patriotic” Cai Mingchao (蔡銘超), who made the winning bid and then announced he had no intention of paying because they should be returned to China for free. Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu (姜瑜) earlier made the usual noises about how “auctioning cultural objects looted in war time … offends the Chinese people and undermines their cultural rights.”
The silence from Beijing, however, is deafening when it comes to the destruction of cultural treasures and family heirlooms during the Chinese Communist Party’s march to power and the Cultural Revolution.
Promoting a show of Buddhist treasures from Tibetan monestaries is not like exhibiting the jade burial suit of Prince Liu Sheng (劉勝) unearthed in Sichuan or a terracotta warrior or two from Xian or the Beauty of Loulan from Xinjiang.
Beijing’s systematic efforts to crush the culture and religion of Tibet cannot and should not be ignored. The “Sacred Land Tibet — Treasures from the Roof of the World” show should not be seen as a celebration of an ancient culture and religion. It is a display of trophies from a government that has tried to eradicate the culture it purports to be presenting. It is akin to an exhibition of Torah, menorah and other items from sacked synagogues and Jewish homes organized by the Third Reich.
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The Taipei District Court on Nov. 1 agreed to extend the detention of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for his suspected involvement in corruption involving a real-estate project during his time as Taipei mayor. Different voices are beginning to emerge from within the TPP about how to respond to their extended leaderless situation. Following a string of scandals coming to light since early August, including the TPP’s misreporting of election campaign finances and Ko’s alleged corruption related to the Core Pacific City redevelopment project, Ko on Aug. 29 announced he would take a three-month leave of absence from