In 2008, President and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) expressed the hope that the KMT’s Youth Corps could “produce a [Chinese President] Hu Jintao” (胡錦濤). A classic remark, indeed, in view of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) bloody history and the fact that it still has more than 1,000 missiles targeting Taiwan. Ma’s hopes that the KMT can produce a communist-style leader reveals a complete ignorance of what “evil” means.
He is not alone. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently praised Hu as being “rational” and “kind.” It is worrying that Taiwan’s two main political leaders hold such romantic views of Chinese communist rule.
Dictators are neither kind nor reasonable because a dictatorship is synonymous with violent rule. Hu had blood on his hands even before he became president. Just before the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, a protest broke out in Lhasa, and reports said hundreds of Tibetans may have been killed in the military crackdown. At the time, Hu was CCP party secretary in the Tibet Autonomous Region.
After he became president, the human rights situation in China has become even worse than under his predecessor, Jiang Zemin (江澤民). The persecution of Falun Gong practitioners, Christians and dissidents has intensified, as has the suppression of Tibetans and Uighurs. The CCP has also tightened its control over information and freedom of thought.
Nor has Hu displayed reason or kindness in the wake of the recent sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan.
On May 20, an investigation team consisting of Swedish, British, Australian, Canadian and US experts released a report saying there was overwhelming evidence a North Korean submarine sank the ship on March 26, killing 46 South Korean sailors.
The international community condemned North Korean leader Kim Jong-il’s regime. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called it an invasion, Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama called it an unforgivable act, British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs William Hague said North Korea lacked respect for human life and Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd accused it of publicly violating the UN Charter and the armistice agreement between the two Koreas. Even the normally wishy-washy UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called the investigation findings “very disturbing.”
The Chinese government, however, has gone against international opinion. At the latest meeting between foreign ministers from China, Japan and South Korea, the Chinese minister said investigations should be “scientific and objective.” He did not condemn North Korea, and his tone implied that Beijing is preparing to challenge the investigation in favor of North Korea.
After the sinking of the Cheonan, Kim rushed off to Beijing, clearly to discuss with Hu how to handle the incident. Perhaps Hu encouraged Kim and offered Beijing’s support.
Clinton visited Beijing this week before heading to South Korea, possibly to persuade Hu not to favor Pyongyang since South Korea is preparing to seek redress through the UN Security Council.
When the report by the foreign team of experts came out, South Korea’s foreign ministry invited the ambassadors from China, Japan, Russia, the UK, France and about 30 other countries to attend the announcement of the results. Chinese Ambassador to Seoul Zhang Xinsen (張鑫森) declined the invitation. South Korean analysts believed Zhang was acting alone, while instead he represented the position of the Chinese. This could mean that Beijing might use its veto power in the Security Council to block sanctions against North Korea.
The only reason this evil little North Korean dares behave in this outrageous manner is because he has the backing of the big Chinese dictatorship. Hu has said in public that “China must learn from Cuba and North Korea,” as if China isn’t evil enough. Kim and Hu have once again proved that dictators are unreasonable. For democratic Taiwan to nurture illusions about a dictator is very dangerous.
Cao Changqing is a freelance writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND PERRY SVENSSON
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS