May 20 was the second anniversary of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) inauguration. Over the last two years the government has perhaps attracted most attention for the way it has strengthened economic and political ties with China. Indeed, because this policy links Taiwan’s development to that of China, it has been the cause of much dispute ever since Ma came to power in 2008.
This is a controversy that shows no sign of going away despite intensive government propaganda and deployment of its extensive administrative resources. Ma may reason that although small and medium-sized enterprises, residents in central and southern Taiwan and the lower and middle classes are most strongly opposed to the policy, they are the least likely to vote for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). However, the truth is that military personnel, civil servants and school teachers, who are generally cast as traditional supporters of the KMT, may be the ultimate victims of this rash policy.
The salaries of military personnel, civil servants and school teachers are all paid from the public purse. Whether their jobs will continue to be considered an “iron rice bowl” depends on the extent to which economic development boosts personal and national incomes. If the government’s tax revenues are insufficient, the least of its worries will be cutting or freezing wages for public servants — if the situation further deteriorates, there is a very real threat not just to salaries, benefits and insurance, but to jobs. Even retirement pensions accumulated over years could disappear overnight.
Historically, there are numerous examples of how poorly managed national finances have caused difficulties for government agencies. A crisis broke out in the Cayman Islands last year when the government failed to pay civil servants and contractors. With a national income ranked 12th in the world, how could such a situation happen? The problem arose because of the huge income gap between rich and poor.
As a tax haven, the government of the Cayman Islands charges financial institutions registered there huge annual operational fees, but they make no direct contribution to local development. When the global financial crisis hit, operational fees plummeted. This highlights the fact that impressive economic statistics is one thing, improving standards of living is another. The problem lies in uneven wealth distribution, not low incomes.
The government has set several new records during Ma’s two years in office. Government debt has increased by almost NT$900 billion (US$28 billion), while annual tax revenues fell by NT$253.8 billion last year. Unemployment broke through the 6 percent barrier and average real wages returned to a level last seen 13 years ago. Of course the record-high GDP contraction can be blamed on an unfavorable global macroeconomic environment and the situation is likely to improve as the economy prospers. However, there are indications that the policy to rapidly promote cross-strait economic and trade liberalization will have unwanted effects.
While China’s tax revenues and employment rate are likely to rise, it seems inevitable that wealth centralization and income polarization will further climb in Taiwan. As the average income of the salaried class drops, unemployment will increase and military personnel, civil servants and school teachers will be less likely to receive annual salary raises and bonuses. In particular, 70 percent of government tax revenue comes from personal income tax. In the event that the situation worsens, public servants could lose their jobs, not to mention their 18 percent preferential interest rate.
Other than Taiwan’s economic reliance on China, the government is also preparing to recognize Chinese academic credentials and open Taiwanese colleges and universities to Chinese students, which is also expected to affect the employment and promotion of military personnel, civil servants and school teachers.
To curry favor with Beijing, Ma has put aside the issue of sovereignty and declared a “diplomatic truce.” In terms of military affairs, the use of secret channels is a slap in the face to the diplomats who represent Taiwan around the world and the military that safeguards national security.
Although they have not yet been called parasites, there is an increasingly common feeling that public servants no longer know what they are fighting for. The nation is paying a heavy price for Ma’s pro-China policies.
Military personnel, civil servants and school teachers all rely on the government, so the question arises what happens to them if the country perishes. If Ma’s plan for “eventual unification” is ever carried out, they are likely to suffer most. Take Hong Kong for example, where armed Chinese police have been stationed since the 1997 handover and where civil servants and school teachers often take to the streets in protest. Taiwan should watch and learn.
Public sector personnel should not take their current benefits for granted, because every dollar comes from the taxpayer, not the president and his party. If those in power push for a policy that places the interests of conglomerates before those of the public, then they will also unavoidably erode the guarantees traditionally given to military personnel, civil servants and school teachers.
When Ma introduces various pro-China measures through government agencies and wastes taxpayers’ money on propaganda, those executing his policies are not displaying loyalty to party and state, they are committing suicide. Considering the educational level of public servants, it is perhaps strange that they have yet to notice the unenviable future that awaits them.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s