Six years ago, Petr Kalal started saving for a retirement that was four decades away to reduce his reliance on a state pension system that many Czechs of his age believe will be bankrupt by the time they finish working.
The 31-year-old Prague bank clerk is part of a generation worried that today’s politicians will spend away their future by neglecting hard-to-sell structural reforms, such as pensions. Public pension liabilities are set to explode in a couple of decades.
“People who want to govern in the Czech Republic will promise you anything in the world. They will promise that we will solve pensions, we will raise everything, you don’t have to pay anything,” he said. “We should all learn from the Greek example, that one day your debts will come back to find you.”
The issue of how or whether to reform systems in place since the fall of communism 21 years ago has split political parties and voters ahead of a May 28 and May 29 general election that may decide how large a bill future generations will have to foot.
After a decade of procrastination, reforming the pension system is at the heart of how to secure future budgets and keep credit ratings agencies happy.
Unlike neighbors Slovakia, Poland and Hungary, the Czech government still relies solely on a state system that uses tax receipts from workers to pay pensioners today, rather than supplementing the system with longer-term private accounts.
Analysts in a Reuters poll listed reform of the one-pillar pension system as a key task for the next government, although the growing likelihood that no strong winner will emerge from the vote increases the risk reform may not get off the ground.
“From the long-term perspective, the fiscal debt [from pensions] is going to explode if there are no changes to the pension system,” Citibank analyst Jaromir Sindel said.
Kalal’s contemporaries pay the same amount into social security as their parents, but are set to receive far less in retirement benefits. The pay-as-you-go (PAYG) system’s debts will exceed one year of economic output by 2065, according to projections by a government council on pension reform.
With the the number of pensioners set to exceed working-age people by 2050, analysts and industry officials say there needs to be a second pillar pushing taxpayers to put money into state or private-run retirement accounts to meet the demands of an aging population and a shrinking workforce.
“Our current system ... has only one source of financing: the payroll tax. We should start to build up a fully-funded pillar, mainly for the younger generations,” said Jiri Rusnok, an executive adviser and pension director at ING Bank.
Rusnok is on a new 10-member government council that is set to make recommendations on pension reform next month.
The simple option, he said, would be to divert 3 percentage points of the 28 percent social security tax into individual accounts. More expensive would be to add a 3 percent taxpayer contribution that would be matched by the state.
The annual transition cost for the state would be about 0.5 percent to 1 percent of GDP, he said — a tall order at a time when budget deficits have to be slashed.
With European markets battered this year by the fallout from the Greek debt crisis, fiscal discipline has moved to the top of investors’ worry list and it is a hot Czech campaign topic.
The leftist Social Democrats, ahead in the polls, oppose a second pillar and want to protect the PAYG system, saying it should be up to citizens to get an individual account.
Social Democrat voters are on average older, while the right has more support among the young, reflecting their respective policy preferences. The center-right Civic Democrats are for private accounts, as are some smaller right-leaning parties.
For now, Czech state debt levels are about half the EU average, but falling revenue during the economic downturn exposed years of neglect on public spending, of which pensions accounted for 30 percent last year.
Czech Deputy Finance Minister Bohdan Hejduk estimated last month that the pension system would run a 35 billion crown (US$1.70 billion) deficit this year because of structural problems and unemployment.
A STEM agency poll a year ago showed two-thirds of Czechs thought the system needed substantial change or a complete overhaul, while the rest felt no major changes were needed.
The issue prompted two actors to copy a video from the last US presidential election urging people to persuade their grandparents not to vote for leftist parties.
The clip has attracted over 630,000 viewers and gives the message: “The left will only make debts and after your grandparents peacefully pass away, we shall have to pay for it until the end of our lives.”
Czechs have debated pension reform for more than a decade, but lack of political will has meant successive governments failed to introduce a second pillar, instead opting for changes to the PAYG system, such as raising the retirement age.
The government council debating pensions is a reincarnation of a previous body whose recommendations in 2005 fell on deaf ears because of the start of election campaigning then.
For Adam, a 34-year-old manager at a pharmaceutical company, it is best to save now, rather than count on the state system.
“I don’t think [my] state pension will be sufficient to live comfortably on, or maybe even to live on,” he said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY ROBERT MUELLER
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS