To mark his two years in office, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has built two new castles in the sky: a “golden decade” and a “six country” goal — building a strong country based on innovation, reviving the country by promoting culture, initiating environmental protection measures to save the country, consolidating the country with constitutional politics, promoting social welfare to make the country more secure and ensuring peace to protect the country.
Ma is promising Taiwan a bed of roses, but apart from piling beautiful but empty words on top of each other, his “six country” goals offer no substantive policy suggestions. The public response seems to be: “Here he goes again, yet another example of government by slogan.”
Following the 10 infrastructure projects during the reign of Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has promoted other national construction projects, including manufacturing centers, sea cargo transshipment centers, air cargo transshipment centers, financial centers, telecommunications centers, media centers and other Asia-Pacific regional operations centers as a strategy to bring Taiwan into the 21st century. They have all been economic illusions that have died an early death.
Premiers under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government also offered their visions, but their plans were shelved when they left office.
When the government puts forward grand plans, the goal always seems to be to mislead voters — the grander the promise, the greater the chance it will come to naught. The most obvious example is Ma’s election promise that he would create 6 percent annual economic growth, reduce unemployment to 3 percent and bring about a per capita income of US$30,000. After his election, economic growth figures have been dropping and unemployment has gone up. Instead of living up to his promise that everything would be fine if he were elected, every election promise has been broken, but he has not seen fit to apologize to the public for the great discrepancy between his promises and reality.
Ma’s six country statement is meant to sound good, but it is unlikely that it will stand the test of time. As environmental activists demand that the wetlands at the 202 Munitions Works in Taipei City’s Nangang District (南港) — often referred to as the last lung of Taipei — be saved, the government’s decision to turn it into a technology park is diametrically opposed to the part of the six country statement that talks about “initiating environmental protection measures.”
There are also contradictions between the statement and how the administration ignores public opposition and the impact of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) on small and medium enterprises and disadvantaged industries, how it further aggravates the unemployment situation and how it hurts Taiwan’s sovereignty and strategic position in the international arena. Disregarding the deadlock and delays in the ECFA negotiation process, the government insists that the agreement will be signed next month.
Ma’s “golden decade” is even more incomprehensible. Two years remain in Ma’s term, so even if he were re-elected, he would only have six years. He is thus passing responsibility for four to eight years of his plan to the next president, or even presidents. How can a vision with so many holes in it be implemented? Given Ma’s incompetence and lack of credibility, who will believe him? His “golden decade” is simply an inferior rip-off of DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 10-year party program.
Ma has bragged too much and done too little about his castles in the sky and he is incapable of controlling and completing the projects. As a result, his approval ratings continue to hover around 30 percent. After two years in office, Ma remains incapable of self-criticism and he is resorting to government by slogan. Only this time, no one will believe him.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS