To mark his two years in office, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has built two new castles in the sky: a “golden decade” and a “six country” goal — building a strong country based on innovation, reviving the country by promoting culture, initiating environmental protection measures to save the country, consolidating the country with constitutional politics, promoting social welfare to make the country more secure and ensuring peace to protect the country.
Ma is promising Taiwan a bed of roses, but apart from piling beautiful but empty words on top of each other, his “six country” goals offer no substantive policy suggestions. The public response seems to be: “Here he goes again, yet another example of government by slogan.”
Following the 10 infrastructure projects during the reign of Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has promoted other national construction projects, including manufacturing centers, sea cargo transshipment centers, air cargo transshipment centers, financial centers, telecommunications centers, media centers and other Asia-Pacific regional operations centers as a strategy to bring Taiwan into the 21st century. They have all been economic illusions that have died an early death.
Premiers under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government also offered their visions, but their plans were shelved when they left office.
When the government puts forward grand plans, the goal always seems to be to mislead voters — the grander the promise, the greater the chance it will come to naught. The most obvious example is Ma’s election promise that he would create 6 percent annual economic growth, reduce unemployment to 3 percent and bring about a per capita income of US$30,000. After his election, economic growth figures have been dropping and unemployment has gone up. Instead of living up to his promise that everything would be fine if he were elected, every election promise has been broken, but he has not seen fit to apologize to the public for the great discrepancy between his promises and reality.
Ma’s six country statement is meant to sound good, but it is unlikely that it will stand the test of time. As environmental activists demand that the wetlands at the 202 Munitions Works in Taipei City’s Nangang District (南港) — often referred to as the last lung of Taipei — be saved, the government’s decision to turn it into a technology park is diametrically opposed to the part of the six country statement that talks about “initiating environmental protection measures.”
There are also contradictions between the statement and how the administration ignores public opposition and the impact of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) on small and medium enterprises and disadvantaged industries, how it further aggravates the unemployment situation and how it hurts Taiwan’s sovereignty and strategic position in the international arena. Disregarding the deadlock and delays in the ECFA negotiation process, the government insists that the agreement will be signed next month.
Ma’s “golden decade” is even more incomprehensible. Two years remain in Ma’s term, so even if he were re-elected, he would only have six years. He is thus passing responsibility for four to eight years of his plan to the next president, or even presidents. How can a vision with so many holes in it be implemented? Given Ma’s incompetence and lack of credibility, who will believe him? His “golden decade” is simply an inferior rip-off of DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 10-year party program.
Ma has bragged too much and done too little about his castles in the sky and he is incapable of controlling and completing the projects. As a result, his approval ratings continue to hover around 30 percent. After two years in office, Ma remains incapable of self-criticism and he is resorting to government by slogan. Only this time, no one will believe him.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS