Respect for environment
A devastating leak prompted by an explosion at an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico last month means it might take decades for the Louisiana wetlands to recover from an oil spill three times larger than previously thought .
The disaster caused by the oil spill is a nightmare, and calls for immediate action to save threatened areas not only to reduce the environmental and economic impact but also to protect the natural ecology.
US President Barack Obama tried to reassure fishermen and others in the Louisiana area that the government would do whatever it takes for as long as it takes to cope with the oil spill (“Obama reassures as oil spill spreads,” May 4, page 7). However, after much calculation, the extent of the seriousness of this pollution is still unknown.
The US government should pay full attention to the consequences of this catastrophe because the fishing and tourism industries and the ecosystem of the affected areas will suffer severely. Moreover, it might take decades for the polluted areas to recover.
All of us understand that oil is one of the most important energy sources and is indispensable in many industries; nevertheless, the damage caused by leaking oil has prompted people to rethink the impact of offshore oil exploration.
Our natural resources and marine wildlife have been seriously harmed by accidents such as the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
People have searched for alternative energy forms such as solar, wind and geothermal energy since the turn of the century.
This most recent disaster has taught us not only to focus on people’s safety on offshore rigs, but to also put more effort into developing alternative and renewable energy sources.
In conclusion, it is imperative that we take it as our responsibility to protect the Earth. After all, our world cannot afford more damage from disasters such as oil spills, earthquakes, floods and drought.
CLAIRE WU
Taipei County
Pacific Islanders’ history
With reference to your review of my book, Surviving Paradise (“Notes from a very small island,” May 9, page 14), and Bradley Winterton’s doubts about my claim that Taiwanese Aborigines colonized the Pacific Islands, I would like to clarify and support this claim.
It is the orthodox view among linguists, anthropologists and archeologists that the origin point for the colonization of the Pacific Islands was Taiwan. Between 5,000 and 7,000 years ago, the ancestors of the modern Taiwanese Aborigines expanded out of Taiwan into the Philippines, Indonesia, New Guinea and the Solomon Islands, mixed with local populations, and then colonized previously uninhabited islands in Melanesia, Polynesia and Micronesia — including the Marshall Islands.
So modern-day Pacific Islanders and modern-day Taiwanese Aborigines have common ancestors who lived in Taiwan and some of the Taiwanese Aborigines who lived 5,000 to 7,000 years ago were responsible for setting off the expansion that would eventually lead to such feats as establishing a civilization on the remote Easter Island and discovering Hawaii and Madagascar across vast stretches of empty ocean.
One reason most academics agree that Pacific Islanders originated in Taiwan is that the Taiwanese Aborigines speak Austronesian languages related to the languages spoken by Pacific Islanders. The rich diversity of Austronesian languages spoken in Taiwan indicates that the language family developed there for many thousands of years and then, more recently, was carried to other islands like the Marshall Islands.
This is similar to the Germanic languages found in Europe that shows (if we didn’t know already) that the Germanic languages arose there and were later carried to places like England, rather than vice-versa.
Modern-day Pacific Islanders feel no sense of connection toward Taiwan as an ancestral place of origin, but that is almost certainly where they came from.
PETER RUDIAK-GOULD
PhD student in anthropology, Oxford University
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS