Respect for environment
A devastating leak prompted by an explosion at an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico last month means it might take decades for the Louisiana wetlands to recover from an oil spill three times larger than previously thought .
The disaster caused by the oil spill is a nightmare, and calls for immediate action to save threatened areas not only to reduce the environmental and economic impact but also to protect the natural ecology.
US President Barack Obama tried to reassure fishermen and others in the Louisiana area that the government would do whatever it takes for as long as it takes to cope with the oil spill (“Obama reassures as oil spill spreads,” May 4, page 7). However, after much calculation, the extent of the seriousness of this pollution is still unknown.
The US government should pay full attention to the consequences of this catastrophe because the fishing and tourism industries and the ecosystem of the affected areas will suffer severely. Moreover, it might take decades for the polluted areas to recover.
All of us understand that oil is one of the most important energy sources and is indispensable in many industries; nevertheless, the damage caused by leaking oil has prompted people to rethink the impact of offshore oil exploration.
Our natural resources and marine wildlife have been seriously harmed by accidents such as the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
People have searched for alternative energy forms such as solar, wind and geothermal energy since the turn of the century.
This most recent disaster has taught us not only to focus on people’s safety on offshore rigs, but to also put more effort into developing alternative and renewable energy sources.
In conclusion, it is imperative that we take it as our responsibility to protect the Earth. After all, our world cannot afford more damage from disasters such as oil spills, earthquakes, floods and drought.
CLAIRE WU
Taipei County
Pacific Islanders’ history
With reference to your review of my book, Surviving Paradise (“Notes from a very small island,” May 9, page 14), and Bradley Winterton’s doubts about my claim that Taiwanese Aborigines colonized the Pacific Islands, I would like to clarify and support this claim.
It is the orthodox view among linguists, anthropologists and archeologists that the origin point for the colonization of the Pacific Islands was Taiwan. Between 5,000 and 7,000 years ago, the ancestors of the modern Taiwanese Aborigines expanded out of Taiwan into the Philippines, Indonesia, New Guinea and the Solomon Islands, mixed with local populations, and then colonized previously uninhabited islands in Melanesia, Polynesia and Micronesia — including the Marshall Islands.
So modern-day Pacific Islanders and modern-day Taiwanese Aborigines have common ancestors who lived in Taiwan and some of the Taiwanese Aborigines who lived 5,000 to 7,000 years ago were responsible for setting off the expansion that would eventually lead to such feats as establishing a civilization on the remote Easter Island and discovering Hawaii and Madagascar across vast stretches of empty ocean.
One reason most academics agree that Pacific Islanders originated in Taiwan is that the Taiwanese Aborigines speak Austronesian languages related to the languages spoken by Pacific Islanders. The rich diversity of Austronesian languages spoken in Taiwan indicates that the language family developed there for many thousands of years and then, more recently, was carried to other islands like the Marshall Islands.
This is similar to the Germanic languages found in Europe that shows (if we didn’t know already) that the Germanic languages arose there and were later carried to places like England, rather than vice-versa.
Modern-day Pacific Islanders feel no sense of connection toward Taiwan as an ancestral place of origin, but that is almost certainly where they came from.
PETER RUDIAK-GOULD
PhD student in anthropology, Oxford University
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals