Make a choice — stop Ma
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) thanks-but-no-thanks to future US military involvement in the Taiwan Strait promises to outlive all assurances his administration will be providing to Washington externally and Taiwanese internally. The simple reason is that the prime beneficiary of the deliberate remark is China, the nation toward which Ma is diligently prodding Taiwan.
That declaration went further than just punctuating a CNN interview, in which Ma went to some length to convince the West that the incorporation of Taiwan’s economy into China’s would advance both the causes of international trade and regional peace. It became difficult to resist the impression that Ma is promoting the myth of a peaceful and voluntary surrender of Taiwan to China.
Ma’s unification dream is shared by only a fraction of the Taiwanese population. This is evidenced by public polls, conducted by both pro-Taiwan and pro-China organizations, invariably showing that an overwhelming majority of Taiwanese favoring an indefinite separation of Taiwan from China.
Taiwanese consciousness, the sentiment that most succinctly reflects Taiwanese longing for formal sovereignty, actually rose in the last two years in spite of Ma and his Chinese National Party’s (KMT) constant attempt to ignore, if not suppress it. Democracy and freedom, both integral to sovereignty when Taiwan is facing an authoritarian China as its sole external enemy, are ingrained in Taiwanese daily life.
Therefore, any illusion that the absorption of Taiwan into China will be peaceful and painless should have evaporated the moment Beijing promulgated its “Anti-Secession” Law, the Chinese statute that outlaws Taiwan’s sovereignty and its advocacy as well as spelling out conditions necessitating China’s use of force against Taiwan.
Ma and the KMT have been trying to drive a wedge among Taiwanese by using economic bait with some success. However, the resulting and widening gulf between the haves and have-nots will only sow more seeds of instability.
It is unfortunate the collective memory of Taiwan’s last transfer of rule of similar magnitude at the end of World War II has all but faded away, even though the suffering lasted at least two generations for Taiwanese.
Taiwanese didn’t have a choice then, but Taiwanese have a choice now, albeit one that would require considerable sacrifices not unlike prices with which other societies pay for their freedom.
Significantly, the dynamics involved in Taiwan’s status are far more complex today than the time of the last “sky change” more than 60 years ago.
Ma’s push-away of the US may have negated the ambiguity of the Taiwan Relations’ Act that obviously helped to maintain tranquility in the region for decades. Yet, the strategic significance of Taiwan to the US-Japan alliance remains unchanged.
Simply put, peaceful annexation of Taiwan by China will never happen. Instead, the path of least resistance would dictate that Taiwan be put through an indefinite period of turmoil before — and if — all powers involved can forge a formula for the status of Taiwan that could guarantee regional stability.
Taiwanese are facing two clear options: Stop Ma and the KMT now or prepare to endure being a forsaken nation that is perpetuated by external forces.
HUANG JEI-HSUAN
California
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS