The victory in the Lafayette arbitration court case is of major significance to Taiwan. The huge sums involved in the Lafayette frigate deal led to the death of Navy Captain Yin Ching-feng (尹清楓), a major navy personnel reshuffle, several years of domestic political conflict, several political scandals in France and several international court cases in Taiwan, France and Switzerland.
However, the victory does not imply that all the fraud has been cleared up. The fraud case and the arbitration case are two different matters. Proving that commissions actually were paid in connection with the Lafayette case is just the beginning of a new wave of investigations. The government must now increase efforts to clarify the channels through which the commissions were forwarded and determine which officials were involved.
Credit must go to former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) for his determination to pursue the investigation “even if it shakes the nation’s very foundation” and to the Control Yuan for pressuring the Ministry of National Defense to file an arbitration lawsuit.
Taiwan obtained information that the secret Swiss bank account of arms dealer Andrew Wang (汪傳浦) included money connected to the Lafayette case. The French side said Wang represented Taiwan, which meant it could not have violated the contractual ban on commission payments, but Taiwan won the case by proving Wang was neither a government official nor a representative. The main reason the case was finally solved was that Taiwanese investigators were able to bring home six crates of documents regarding Wang’s bank account and other secret papers from Switzerland. They found that in 1990, Wang and a French counterpart had signed a secret agreement specifying an 18 percent kickback. The documents were key to solving many detailed issues.
Taiwan may have won the arbitration, but the recipients and channels remain unclear. Merely retrieving the money will be unacceptable to Yin’s family and to the Taiwanese public. When former premier Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村) and retired vice admiral and former chief of the Navy’s Shipbuilding Office Lei Hsueh-ming (雷學明) said the result cleared their names, they were talking through their hats. The fact that the money will be returned doesn’t mean the guilty no longer need to be found. The fraud and murder investigation must continue.
Wang, who remains in hiding in the UK, is crucial to the case. When investigating Wang’s bank accounts, Swiss courts told Taiwan they also held sales commissions paid out in connection with Taiwan’s purchase of Mirage fighter jets, French-made Mica air-to-air missiles and Matra R550 Magic 2 missiles. As long as the investigations into the Lafayette and the Mirage commissions do not involve Wang, we will not find out what went on and where commissions went.
In September 2006, investigators charged Wang with corruption and they must now bring him before a Taiwanese court. The team also filed a lawsuit against Lei, and the Taipei District Court is expected to issue a verdict in that case late next month.
This case has dragged on for nine years, but the resolution of the arbitration case will help to find the officials in the navy and the Ministry of National Defense as well as the mysterious “high government officials” that shared in the commissions.
The Lafayette case has been resolved and an arbitration lawsuit was filed in the Mirage case in 2003. The government must reject any out-of-court settlements. The bottom line in every case of fraud in connection with these arms purchases must be to pursue it to the end and to deal with every official that has taken money and broken the law.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of