Last week, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) wrote a sentimental remembrance of a former leader of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Hu Yaobang (胡耀邦), which was reported by a leading US newspaper. For those of us who are old enough to remember, Hu was the first heir apparent to Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), but was later dumped by Deng because the conservative wing did not like him. His sudden death in April 1989 continues to be viewed as the chief catalyst to the student movement that eventually ended tragically on June 4 of that year.
Given the connection between Hu’s death and what was arguably the most significant socio-political movement in post-Mao China, it is not at all surprising that China watchers are wondering about the significance of Wen’s remembrance. The fact that it was published in the People’s Daily, the CCP’s mouthpiece, further stirs the imagination of professionals who spend their lifetimes trying to figure out what is happening behind the doors of the leadership compound in Beijing.
Although it is still too early to say it is a mistake to suggest that this remembrance indicates the coming of major political changes in China, ie, democracy, it is best to go beyond Hu and examine the content of the remembrance in light of recent events and in the context of contemporary China.
A quick read of the remembrance will show that the essay has the following themes: (1) Hu loved the people, especially the downtrodden; (2) his visits to southern and southwestern China, including Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi provinces, were motivated by compassion and interest in the disadvantaged; and (3) Wen was with him during those visits.
Now let’s put these themes in the context of present-day China. Thirty years of economic modernization have made China a richer country, but have also made the rich richer and the poor poorer. As a result of the efforts of Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) predecessor, capitalists are now allowed to be members of the CCP, which historically claims to represent only the workers and the peasants. Although no event like the student movement of 1989 has reoccurred (the public aspect of the Falun Gong movement ended rather swiftly), by the Chinese government’s own admission, protests and “mass incidents” are on the rise. Those mass incidents usually involve the less fortunate members of Chinese society.
Meanwhile, official corruption is on the rise and the top leadership of the CCP is using a combination of exhortation, training and public campaigns to demonstrate that it is doing an effective job of cleaning house, all in an effort to soothe the public. Recently, the top official in charge of anti-corruption matters wrote an essay that repeated calls for CCP members to become exemplars and servants of the people. In the last two years, CCP leaders of the over 2,000 counties in China were mandated to receive “training” at the Central Party School in Beijing to learn how to effectively handle mass incidents. Finally, the highly publicized crackdown on the corrupt police force of Chongqing municipality has captured domestic and international attention.
Furthermore, Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi provinces are suffering a historic drought. Wen, charged with direct responsibility for economic and development issues, has visited the areas in question with tears in his eyes and apologies on his lips. Even before the recent crisis in these areas, “Grandpa Wen” had already captivated the hearts and minds of people in China and beyond by issuing live, in-person apologies to the people stranded at a train station during the big snowstorm of 2008 that blanketed all of southern China, and for his seeming omnipresence during the Sichuan earthquake relief effort in 2008.
Placing Wen’s emotional writing into this context, it seems pretty obvious that Wen’s remembrance is an appeal to the Chinese people that the party-state recognizes the plight of the common people and that CCP officials must never forget the importance of staying in touch with the people. In this sense, Hu Yaobang serves as a great role model. Moreover, the current administration under Hu Jintao and Wen should be credited for their emphasis on the creation of a “harmonious society,” ie, a society with greater equality and distributive justice.
In other words, Wen’s writing is unlikely to indicate a shifting of the political wind. The reality is that fewer and fewer people, both inside and outside China, still speak of democracy as an inevitable or even desirable political outcome in China. A more significant question in many people’s minds is how the party-state can govern more effectively. What is interesting about Wen’s essay, then, is not the mention of Hu Yaobang. What is interesting is that it seems to be evoking images of the past, those of a revolutionary party staying close to its roots. Yet, as Wen calls on the CCP to remember its roots, his essay also reveals an ideologically bankrupt state that is running out of new ways to govern effectively, so much so that it now must call upon the ghosts of its past to save its present and future.
I sincerely wish Grandpa Wen success in his endeavor, but somehow his readers are bound to misread him or his words will fall on deaf ears. That would be unfortunate.
John W. Tai is a doctoral candidate at George Washington University. Since 2007, he has resided in Beijing and Shanghai, where he is researching and writing his dissertation. He also teaches and administers a US university study-abroad program.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS