At a press conference on April 13, Minister Without Portfolio Yiin Chii-ming (尹啟銘) questioned the accuracy of comments on an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) made by Wang To-far (王塗發), a professor of economics who claims that Taiwan would have to remove the tariffs on 90 percent of its Chinese imports within 10 years of signing an ECFA.
According to Yiin, the length of time and the percentage of products that will be tax-exempt will be determined by the needs of the signatory countries. Using the Japan-Singapore Economic Partnership Agreement as an example, he said that agreement only covers 76 percent of Japan’s imports from Singapore.
In response to Wang’s estimate, the Chinese-language daily the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) reported on April 14 that Article 24 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the predecessor of the WTO, states that a free-trade area shall be formed within “a reasonable length of time” after a free-trade agreement (FTA) is signed and that this period may exceed 10 years only in exceptional cases. It is thus wrong to say that it will depend on the needs of the signatory countries.
As for Yiin’s claim that the Japan-Singapore FTA covers 76 percent of Japan’s imports from Singapore, that only tells half the story, and the wrong half at that.
The WTO calculates the ratio of openness — the trade coverage ratio — using two methods: One is calculated based on the number of product categories and the other is calculated based on import value.
The Taiwan WTO Center at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, which is responsible for the government’s ECFA research, also publishes an e-paper on the WTO. Deputy Director Tu Chaw-hsia (杜巧霞) published an article in Volume 36 of the e-paper, released in 2005.
According to Tu’s article, “The concerns over coverage in RTA [Regional Trade Agreement] negotiations,” the tax-exempt ratio of Japanese imports from Singapore is indeed 76 percent when calculated based on the tax number of product categories. If, however, calculated based on import value, the tax exemption ratio reaches as high as 93 percent.
The reason for the large gap between the two methods, as Tu explains in her article, is that “Japan has reservations about opening its agricultural market while Singapore has no agricultural sector … Japan does not import any agricultural products from Singapore.”
In other words, Japan could have listed Singaporean agricultural products as duty-free and increased the coverage to more than 90 percent as calculated based on the number of product categories.
However, this would not increase the value of imports from Singapore, since it has no agricultural sector and thus cannot export agricultural products to Japan.
This means that the tax-exempt ratio of Japan’s imports from Singapore is more meaningful when calculated based on import value, which is 93 percent.
More interestingly, Tu’s article also states that according to WTO statistics from 2002, the tax-exempt ratio on imports exceeded 95 percent for most of the 53 RTAs for which information was available in August 2001. For industrial products, the ratio was also as high as 95 percent with the exception of Turkey.
Despite already far exceeding Yiin’s claim, Wang’s prediction of a ratio of 90 percent is in fact rather conservative.
Lin Kien-tsu is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for
RSS