The Control Yuan has been looking into the issue of Chinese spouses and has issued a report on the laws governing them and their social implications. The report points out that these laws are both unconstitutional and in breach of their human rights. It also says prejudice against Chinese spouses still exists in Taiwanese society.
This came just as Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) made some cutting remarks about these spouses, accusing them of trying to divorce as soon as they receive citizenship. Chen also criticized any suggestion of amending the law to give them more rights.
I often hear people using similar arguments against female immigrants to support the assertion that the government should not guarantee the rights of spouses from China or any other foreign country. They also argue that the government should not reduce the number of years these women have to wait until they can get citizenship, the rationale being that withholding citizenship keeps them looking after the elderly people in the family and performing their duties as a wife and mother — so the argument goes.
Taiwanese men are going off to China, Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia in search of a wife to take care of them and act as baby-making machines. This wife is expected to know her place and not complain. Naturally, the idea of divorce to follow her own dreams is out of the question, and the state has created laws to enforce these expectations.
This sort of portrayal of such women smacks of a male chauvinism best consigned to the past. How many people in Taiwan today would apply such “standards” to Taiwanese women? Taiwanese women left behind the demure Oshin character we saw on TV many years ago and have learned to demand their rights and create the future they want. Taiwanese men, too, are well aware that they need to treat their partner as an equal. The days of expecting Taiwanese women to be obedient baby-making machines are in the past, and there’s no going back.
It does appear, however, that foreign spouses are taking on the “traditional role” of the Taiwanese woman. Taiwanese men are now picking foreign women who they believe are going to do as they say and many Taiwanese women seem to be happy to allow these “outsiders” perform a job that they themselves do not want to do. Taiwanese men and women enjoy equal rights in this country; is it acceptable to deny these same rights to others simply because they are non-Taiwanese?
The legal system is complicit in this. As the law stands, the residency status of these immigrant spouses is far from certain until they actually obtain Taiwanese citizenship. It is an endorsement of traditional patriarchy, effectively saying that the woman has to “behave herself” because if her husband files for divorce she will be sent “back to where she came from.” These women undertook to begin a new life in a foreign land, so they are likely to be strong and capable people. Ironically enough, before they obtain Taiwanese citizenship, they are more often than not expected to suppress themselves and play the submissive woman.
In other words, laws like these which work to restrict new immigrants create inappropriate expectations among Taiwanese: that it is OK to ensnare women because of their immigrant status for a period of servitude defined by the time it takes them to receive their citizenship. If the Taiwanese man goes looking for a foreign spouse with this kind of attitude, can we really blame these women for viewing the moment they obtain Taiwanese citizenship as the end of their contractual obligations?
Not only should our laws be rewritten to stop the oppressive and prejudiced treatment of spousal immigrants, they should actually make positive assurances. Only when new immigrants are accorded the same status as Taiwanese women will the men in this country stop looking for a Chinese or Southeast Asian wife to be “a convenient caregiver” or “an obedient mother for my children.” This would make possible an equal and healthy foundation for international marriages.
Bruce Liao is an assistant law professor at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS