Taiwanese golfer Yani Tseng (曾雅妮) has done her country proud by surging to second place in the women’s world golf rankings after winning the Kraft Nabisco Championship earlier this month in Rancho Mirage, California. Having scored victories in major tournaments such as the McDonald’s Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA) Championship in 2008 and the LPGA Corning Classic last year, Tseng has undoubtedly boosted the profile of Taiwanese professional athletes on the international sporting stage.
One recent development revealed by her father, Tseng Mao-hsin (曾茂炘), however, may dishearten many of the nation’s sports fans and lead some to wonder whether the government is at all sincere when it — as recently as earlier this month in a promise reiterated by the Sports Affairs Council minister — speaks of fostering the development of the nation’s sports industry.
Tseng Mao-hsin on Sunday confirmed that China’s Huabin Group has made an offer of a five-year sponsorship contract worth US$25 million to his daughter. While the details are still under discussion, Tseng Mao-hsin added that his daughter, as a Taiwanese national, would prefer to collaborate with groups from Taiwan’s business community. However, no local sponsor has expressed such interest so far, he said. It is regrettable and downright discouraging to see the government as well as the Taiwanese business community fail to value world-class performers like Yani Tseng, who are assets to the country. Her plight is reminiscent of the one faced by billiards player Wu Chia-ching (吳珈慶), who has decided to apply for Singaporean citizenship because the Chinese Taipei Billiard Association could not offer him what Singapore has promised him.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), an avid jogger and swimmer himself, has often spoken of the importance of sports and how his government attached value to sports development. It is therefore confusing to see how the government would spend NT$3.9 billion (US$122 million) to build 150 new school swimming pools and renovate 150 existing ones in the next 12 years while being so unenthusiastic in extending a hand by spending US$25 million to help an athlete like Yani Tseng, whose performance has made her a prominent international professional athlete and helped pin Taiwan on the world map.
After all, many ask, what better way to put taxpayers’ money to good use than allocating it to events and programs that provide much-needed resources and support to the nation’s athletes and promote excellence in the sports arena?
It is disappointing that the government has seemingly resorted to a lazy approach when it comes to sports, in which it sits back and watches the players struggle on their own, then steals their limelight and credit and harvests their hard-earned glory when they achieve success.
The crux of the predicament is the government’s slothful attitude that on the one hand wishes for the nation’s players to perform well in international tournaments, while on the other is reluctant to offer assistance and the means for the cultivation and development of a star-in-the-making like Yani Tseng. Until such attitudes change, it won’t be long before another Wu Chia-ching or Yani Tseng is left with no option but to leave Taiwan for the survival of his or her sporting career.
Recently, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) hastily pushed amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) through the Legislative Yuan, sparking widespread public concern. The legislative process was marked by opaque decisionmaking and expedited proceedings, raising alarms about its potential impact on the economy, national defense, and international standing. Those amendments prioritize short-term political gains at the expense of long-term national security and development. The amendments mandate that the central government transfer about NT$375.3 billion (US$11.47 billion) annually to local governments. While ostensibly aimed at enhancing local development, the lack
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Having enjoyed contributing regular essays to the Liberty Times and Taipei Times now for several years, I feel it is time to pull back. As some of my readers know, I have enjoyed a decades-long relationship with Taiwan. My most recent visit was just a few months ago, when I was invited to deliver a keynote speech at a major conference in Taipei. Unfortunately, my trip intersected with Double Ten celebrations, so I missed the opportunity to call on friends in government, as well as colleagues in the new AIT building, that replaced the old Xin-yi Road complex. I have
On New Year’s Day, it is customary to reflect on what the coming year might bring and how the past has brought about the current juncture. Just as Taiwan is preparing itself for what US president-elect Donald Trump’s second term would mean for its economy, national security and the cross-strait “status quo” this year, the passing of former US president Jimmy Carter on Monday at the age of 100 brought back painful memories of his 1978 decision to stop recognizing the Republic of China as the seat of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China. It is an
RSS