From Burmese pythons to pygmy marmosets, there is a roaring illegal trade in animals online. A recent convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species found one rare species — the Kaiser’s spotted newt (an orange and black salamander in the highland streams of Iran) — now numbers fewer than 1,000 adults in the wild because of Internet trading. So what can you find on the Internet? In just one day, I discovered dealers who appear to be selling some of the rarest species on Earth.
PLOUGHSHARE TORTOISE
Within a few hours, I was staring at an advert for one of the world’s most endangered creatures. It read: “Very superb, jumbo size and most of all very rare.”
Only 200 mature ploughshare tortoises survive in the bamboo scrub lands of north Madagascar; the rest, it seems, are online. And what would this pair of 30-year-old tortoises cost? £24,000 (US$37,000), and a trip to Kuala Lumpur: There’s no international shipping.
BURMESE STARRED TORTOISE
It is against the law to remove the critically endangered Burmese starred tortoise from the forests of Myanmar, but I easily found an apparent seller in Bangkok, Thailand. The dealer’s picture features 35 turtles in a laundry basket lined with newspaper and wilted lettuce. Ten years ago, a survey by the Wildlife Conservation Society found few specimens in the wild. They did, however, find a tortoise trader in every village. This seller was asking £320 in cash for each specimen.
BOSC’S MONITOR LIZARD AND BALL PYTHON
One classified advert offered a “snake show” and “horse riding” along with Bosc’s monitor lizards (£70) and ball pythons (£ 75). International law requires that these African species come with permits from their country of origin — conservationists worry that few wild-caught Bosc’s survive to maturity in captivity and supplies are replenished from wild populations. The ad doesn’t mention permits.
PARROTS AND MACAWS
A Google search for pet birds turned up an eight-year old Tucuman Amazon (£450) in Canada. The seller claimed the bird is from the wild, which would make it illegal: After 20,000 Tucumans left Argentina in the 1980s to become pets, international trade in the species was banned in 1990.
ELEPHANT IVORY
In 2008, eBay banned the sale of ivory, finding it impossible to ensure trade was legal. It’s still available online, however. I called one dealer who seemed knowledgeable about the required permits; the same can’t be said of many online sellers. Some nod to legality by claiming their ivory is antique; others don’t bother. On Craigslist I found an “Endangered Species Ivory Neclace” (sic) in California (US$120). The seller claims it’s “circa 1980,” but without a permit, there’s no way to tell.
HAWKSBILL TURTLE
In Japan, artisans began carving hawksbill shells — the only true source of tortoiseshell — in the 1700s, but banned import of the critically endangered sea turtle in 1993. I found what appeared to be a tortoiseshell item on eBay: A “Brand New Takayama Ex-Takahashi Chikudo Model Shamisen Bekko Bachi Plectrum.” It’s a pic for a banjo-like Japanese instrument. The seller in New York promised a “natural material” of premium grade. Price US$370, will ship worldwide.
SHAHTOOSH
It takes the wool from five dead Tibetan antelope to make one shawl. That means you could get about 30,000 luxury garments from the herd estimated to remain in north western Tibet. It’s illegal worldwide to sell the wool, but I found an online dealer in Kashmir claiming to sell shahtoosh shawls along with “fancy wicker baskets.” Price unlisted.
RADIATED TORTOISE
In the wild, the radiated tortoise spends its days munching cactus in the bush lands of southern Madagascar. “Sub zero,” a dealer in Prai, Malaysia, has two that are two-and-a-half years into a life that can last for 100. This pair could outlive the population as a whole: Scientists have predicted it is headed for collapse in the next half century because of habitat loss and the wildlife trade. Price £710 and £1,220, although Sub zero is offering a “mega discount.”
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS