While most households living below the poverty line are hoping the government will expand its disbursement of subsistence allowances, they are expecting this from a deficit-ridden government that is under strain in boosting social welfare spending.
The irony is that this government appeared to accommodate the public by cutting both personal and business income taxes as well as trimming inheritance and gift taxes last year.
In January, the Ministry of the Interior (MOI) completed the drafting of an amendment to the Social Assistance Act (社會救助法) that aims to find a way to redefine the poverty line (or the minimum cost of living) and expand the number of households covered by government subsidies.
However, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) on Thursday returned the proposed amendment to the MOI. He instructed the ministry to conduct further discussions with local governments about the amendment’s possible impact on their finances, before submitting an updated draft to the Cabinet for review in two weeks. The ministry estimated the expanded subsidies would cost both the central and local governments an additional NT$3.33 billion (US$105 million) on top of the current NT$8.5 billion price tag.
Even so, it seems likely that the poverty line threshold will be revised and the scope of subsidies expanded to address the gradual increase in the number of low-income families over the past few years.
As of the end of last year, 249,834 people, or 1.08 percent of the population, were considered to be living beneath the government-defined poverty line, which means their incomes were below the minimum cost of living for the city in which they lived.
The government calculated the minimum cost of living per person per month at NT$14,558 in Taipei City last year, NT$10,792 in Taipei County, NT$11,309 in Kaohsiung City and NT$9,829 in all other municipalities. The number was even lower for Kinmen and Matsu, at NT$7,400 per month.
The MOI said the proposed amendment would provide monthly subsistence allowances as well as subsidies for health insurance premiums, national pension premiums and tuition fees to 240,000 more people. Overall, nearly 500,000 mid and low-income people would receive financial aid from the government once the amendment clears the legislature.
No one would doubt the official poverty rate of 1.08 percent is impressive compared with that of many other countries, but does this rate reflect a true picture of poverty in Taiwan? A quick answer is no, because a significant number of people are not eligible for government assistance under the current definition. They don’t qualify for such benefits because of the government’s strict criteria, which include the level of household income and the ownership of personal assets and real estate.
Nevertheless, the move to redraw the poverty line reflects concern about economically disadvantaged people’s persistently low wages in the labor market and their unremitting lack of jobs — a situation that keeps them trapped in a vicious cycle of poverty.
Although the government might be concerned that some people would exploit the welfare system by relying on subsidies while not looking for work, these people represent only a small proportion of those who are poor.
What the government should try to understand is that while Taiwan’s unemployment rate may have fallen from its peak, new jobs are not created for low-income people in an equally meaningful sense as they are for the rest of the population, as far as competitiveness is concerned. Therefore, in addition to revising the poverty line, more incentives to low-income people to pursue vocational training or further education would be a key factor in enhancing their future standard of living and quality of life.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS