It’s an irony for Chinese negotiators who took part in the second round of economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) negotiations in Taoyuan County yesterday to say from a resort in Dasi that they remain open-minded about the trade pact and would do whatever they can to minimize any potential negative impact on the local economy.
Dasi is home to dictator Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) mausoleum, which to this day remains off-limits to Chinese tour groups, despite its popularity and the fact that tourism authorities in Beijing have never formally restricted the visits.
If you talk in private to Taiwanese travel agencies that arrange local trips for Chinese tourists, they will confirm that it is an unwritten rule that no travel agency will put anything related to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) old-time rival on the tour groups’ itineraries.
Only individual tourists who come from a third country and are not escorted by Chinese tour guides can visit the mausoleum.
That shows China isn’t as open-minded and democratic as it would like to imply.
Although refusing to pay tribute to a former dictator might be construed as honorable under other circumstances, it is no less than a joke for the CCP, which is just as authoritarian as Chiang’s regime was, to have such a ban — a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black.
Taiwanese tour operators will also tell you that Beijing authorities prohibit their outbound tourists from speaking freely to the media unless their comments are pre-approved.
This is just one small example of how China says one thing, but means another. Nobody should be surprised when Chinese officials hide their true colors.
This holds especially true when one considers the comments made yesterday by Tang Wei (唐煒), director of the Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Department under China’s Ministry of Commerce, who chaired the first round of talks on Jan. 26 in Beijing and co-chaired yesterday’s round of talks in Dasi.
Tang, in his opening address, heaped praise on the ECFA, saying that Chinese leaders aim to facilitate such a “good thing.”
Then he admitted that the trade pact would not be a panacea that will boost the local economy, although he said it was not a “horrifying monster” that will destroy Taiwan’s economy. In the afternoon, he admitted that “it is too difficult to tend to every aspect of the deal as the clock is ticking.”
Without going into details, what Tang said raised nothing but more doubts about the deal.
Is an ECFA a good thing or not? Good for whom?
Why are both sides in such a hurry to ink the deal when they say the deal is neither sweet nor bitter? Why not spend more time and tend to every detail of the deal before signing it, which would be in the interest of both sides?
No answers, of course, will be offered to these questions for the time being.
But let’s hope the upcoming debate or “dialogue” between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) will shed some light on the matter.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS