Anyone who has traveled across the globe in the first few months of this year will surely have been struck by one thing — how different the mood is in Asia compared with that in the West. Although there is justified concern everywhere about what is happening to the US and European economies, the mood across Asia is more upbeat.
Currently there are two big offsetting forces playing out in the world economy.
The positive — and it is a big plus — is the growing economic might of the emerging economies, led by China and India.
Against this is a big negative: the debt overhang in the West. This is an immediate issue. Getting balance sheets back on track can be a long and painful economic process. This points to considerable downside risks for Western economies.
However, we should not ignore the lesson from one of the pre-crisis debates. Three years ago there was much talk that Asia was decoupled. Thankfully, at Standard Chartered, that was not our view. We said: “Not decoupled but better insulated.” So it proved.
Asia was not immune to the global recession, but it had plenty of policy tools to cope with and minimize the downside risks. Some countries coped better than others, but overall the region did better than was initially feared.
The same lesson is valid now. Recovery is here. But the pace of the rebound will be heavily influenced not just by what happens across Asia, but also by the outlook in the West.
Thus the policy stance in each country will have a clear bearing on how it will cope, both in terms of sustaining the recovery and positioning for longer-term growth.
With a sluggish recovery in the West, emerging economies will need to drive more of their own growth.
Clearly this is happening in India and China, to name but two economies, and that is encouraging. In our view, emerging economies will outperform — but this will not be uniform. The recovery in world trade will naturally help, but a key will be the extent to which domestically driven growth recovers. The need to differentiate across emerging-market regions remains paramount.
Across Africa, the most encouraging aspect is that recovery has been quicker than in previous post-recession scenarios. For the Middle East, it is important not to miss the growth and infrastructure boom unfolding across the region. Across Asia, whilst our previous distinction between export-driven and domestically driven economies is still valid, it needs to be supplemented by the current local drivers.
The fundamentals, the policy response and confidence will drive this recovery onwards. Confidence is hard to call, but has improved considerably in many emerging economies. On the policy front there is a need to differentiate between the near- and the longer-term factors.
In the near term, some of the liquidity pumped into the system over the last year needs to be withdrawn. This is analogous to the normalization of policy that has been talked about in the US. It is about trying to return monetary conditions to normal — but in as timely a way as possible without disrupting the recovery. It is distinct from tightening of policy, which entails raising policy rates.
Meanwhile, in Asia, Malaysia has recently raised policy rates. Others will follow, but in a gradual way. Although there are valid concerns about rising asset prices and worries about higher food prices, the overall inflation picture is still relatively subdued across Asia. This is explained by intense competition, surplus production capacity in many economies and by people still looking for value for money when they spend.
However, monetary and fiscal policies also need to have an eye on the longer-term outlook. In this context, some of the underlying messages from recent annual budgets across the region have been relatively encouraging.
Whether it was in India, China, Hong Kong or Singapore, to name four, the focus is clearly on sustaining the recovery, positioning for future growth and moving up the value curve. Witness South Korea’s focus on fusion energy, Singapore’s plans to boost long-term productivity and to come up with a paradigm-changing technology such as the telephone or the computer, and India’s spending on infrastructure.
This is vital, not only for domestic job generation but also if Asia is to play its role in helping rebalance the world economy.
How will exchange rate policy fit into this? Across Asia, all eyes are on China. The Chinese, it seems, are reluctant to see any significant appreciation in the value of the yuan and continue to intervene in the currency markets. Foreign exchange reserves rise as a result.
For the US, enough is enough. This April there is a strong possibility that the US will cite China as a currency manipulator in the annual report to the Congress. If so, it will not only intensify the debate over China using the currency level as a subsidy to its exporters, but it will also turn up the heat over protectionist issues and force Congress to engage with China to resolve the impasse.
Although a stronger currency would appear to support domestic monetary policy goals in China, this does not guarantee that an appreciation will be imminent. The poor state of Western economies, including Europe, makes the Chinese nervous about a stronger currency. With a fragile world economy and a complex domestic environment, gradualism must dictate the pace at which they move.
Eventually, however, something will have to give and the yuan will appreciate. As China moves, expect the rest of Asia to follow.
Gerard Lyons is chief economist at Standard Chartered Bank.
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Delegation-level visits between the two countries have become an integral part of transformed relations between India and the US. Therefore, the visit by a bipartisan group of seven US lawmakers, led by US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul to India from June 16 to Thursday last week would have largely gone unnoticed in India and abroad. However, the US delegation’s four-day visit to India assumed huge importance this time, because of the meeting between the US lawmakers and the Dalai Lama. This in turn brings us to the focal question: How and to what extent