China’s President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) have made statements about protecting the interests of Taiwanese farmers, which have been echoed by a hopeful President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義).
China’s economic rise has strengthened various Chinese interest groups. In particular, in China’s abnormal system where government and industry are one big family, the interests of businesspeople coincide with the interests of the government and its ministries and agencies. The heads of ministries and agencies have many and complex interests in the industries they are managing, and so they are very careful in how they control these industries.
The economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) talks have been deadlocked because of diverging opinions over the “early harvest” list. China’s talk of compromises to promote the interests of Taiwanese farmers seemed like a godsend, but these statements were made during unofficial talks and were not mentioned at the National People’s Congress. It’s clear then that these statements will not become a universal principle that will apply directly to the ECFA talks. Instead, they will remain a political bargaining chip in the hands of the top leadership.
Ma has said that the ECFA talks are similar to other economic talks based on WTO principles. But the fact is Taiwan and China entered WTO under different conditions — Taiwan as a developed nation and China as a developing nation, giving China many more bargaining chips and room to maneuver. Taiwan’s import restrictions on Chinese industrial and agricultural products, for example, violate the WTO’s most favored nation principle. Similar Chinese restrictions on Taiwanese products, however, would be fully compatible with WTO regulations. That is the reason Hu and Wen are talking about offering compromises to promote the interests of Taiwanese farmers and small and medium enterprises.
As for the financial industry, Taiwan must open its doors to Chinese investors, while China can slap unilateral restrictions on Taiwanese investors. Taiwanese financial institutions are hopeful that Beijing will display the same generosity it has said it would give Taiwanese farmers. The reality is Beijing is not going to give Taiwanese banks reciprocal rights in China for fear that other countries will demand the same treatment.
Based on WTO principles, China not only has a lot of room to maneuver, but is also able to play good cop, bad cop by having its negotiators raise high demands and then having the top leadership offer concessions to score political points in Taiwan.
Instead of tackling these issues one by one, the Ma administration chose to lump everything under the ECFA talks, thereby allowing China to control the process. This shows not only a lack of understanding of Taiwan’s situation, but also the same inability to conduct negotiations as the US beef debacle has demonstrated.
Ker Chien-ming is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS