For the first time since the dinosaurs disappeared, animals and plants are being driven to extinction faster than new species can evolve, one of the world’s experts on biodiversity has warned.
Conservation experts have already signaled that the world is in the grip of the “sixth great extinction” of species, driven by humans’ destruction of natural habitats, hunting, the spread of alien predators and disease, and climate change. However, until recently it had been hoped that the rate at which new species were evolving could keep pace with the loss of diversity.
Speaking before two reports this week on the state of wildlife in Britain and Europe, Simon Stuart, chair of the Species Survival Commission for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) — the body that officially declares species threatened or extinct — said that that point had now almost certainly been crossed.
“Measuring the rate at which new species evolve is difficult, but there’s no question that the current extinction rates are faster than that; I think it’s inevitable,” Stuart said.
The IUCN created shock-waves with a major assessment of the world’s biodiversity in 2004 which calculated the rate of extinction had reached 100 to 1,000 times that suggested by fossil records before humans. No formal calculations have been published since, but conservationists agree the rate of loss has increased, and Stuart said it was possible the dramatic predictions of experts such as the Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson, that the rate of loss could reach 10,000 times the background rate in two decades, could be correct.
“All the evidence is he’s right,” Stuart said. “Some people claim it already is that ... things can only have deteriorated because of the drivers of the losses, such as habitat loss and climate change, all getting worse. But we haven’t measured extinction rates again since 2004, and because our current estimates contain a tenfold range there has to be a very big deterioration or improvement to pick up a change.”
Extinction is part of the evolution of life, and only 2 percent to 4 percent of the species that have ever lived on Earth are thought to be alive today. However, fossil records suggest that for most of the planet’s 3.5 billion-year history the rate of loss may have been about one in every million species each year.
Only 869 extinctions have been formally recorded since 1500, because scientists have described fewer than 2 million of an estimated 5 million to 30 million species around the world, and assessed the conservation status of only 3 percent of those. The global extinction rate is extrapolated from the rate among known species. In this way the IUCN calculated in 2004 that the loss had risen to 100 to 1,000 per million species each year, a situation comparable to the five previous mass extinctions — the last of which was when the dinosaurs were wiped out about 65 million years ago.
Critics, including the author of The Skeptical Environmentalist, Bjorn Lomborg, have argued that because such figures rely on so many estimates, the margins of error make them unreliable.
However, Stuart said that the IUCN figure was likely to be an underestimate of the problem, because scientists are reluctant to declare species extinct even when they have sometimes not been seen for decades, and because few of the world’s plants, fungi and invertebrates have yet been formally recorded and assessed.
Swedish scientists had already warned that anything over 10 times the background rate of extinction — 10 species in every million per year — was above the limit if the world was to be safe for humans, said Stuart.
“No one’s claiming it’s as small as 10 times,” he said. “The only thing we’re certain about is the extent is way beyond what’s natural and it’s getting worse.”
Many more species are discovered every year around the world than are recorded extinct, but these “new” plants and animals are existing species found by humans for the first time.
In addition to extinctions, the IUCN has listed 208 species as “possibly extinct.” Nearly 17,300 species are considered under threat. These include one in five mammals assessed, one in eight birds, one in three amphibians, and one in four corals.
Later this year the Convention on Biological Diversity is expected to formally declare that a pledge by world leaders in 2002 to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010 has not been met, and to agree on new, stronger targets.
Experts stress that understanding of factors that drive plants and animals to extinction has improved greatly, and targeted conservation can be successful in saving species from extinction in the wild.
This year has been declared the international year of biodiversity. It is also hoped that a major UN report this summer on the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity will encourage governments to devote more funds to conservation.
Norman MacLeod, keeper of palaeontology at the Natural History Museum in London, cautioned that when fossil experts find evidence of a great extinction it can appear in a layer of rock covering perhaps 10,000 years, so they cannot say for sure whether there was a sudden crisis or a build-up of extinction rates over centuries or millenniums.
“If things aren’t falling dead at your feet, that doesn’t mean you’re not in the middle of a big extinction event,” he said. “By the same token, if the extinctions are and remain relatively modest, then the changes, [even] aggregated over many years, are still going to end up a relatively modest extinction event.”
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS