Since arriving to a hero’s welcome late last month, the former chief international nuclear watchdog and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mohammed ElBaradei has taken on Egypt’s leadership in the way you might expect of a career diplomat: using delicate language and a non-confrontational approach.
For all the gentle words, however, his whirlwind interviews made it clear that he had come home to shake up the leadership’s long monopoly on power, even as he continued to dance around the question of whether he would run for president.
His message as he dominated the media was a call for Egyptians to press their government for more political freedoms, a provocation in a country where dissent is hardly tolerated and where a viable political opposition has not been allowed to grow. His point was this: Without amending the constitution to allow fully free elections, Egypt could not improve any of the deep social and economic problems that had been allowed to fester under the governing party.
“My goal is that there wouldn’t be one savior for Egypt,” he said in a three-hour TV interview shortly after he arrived. “My goal is for Egypt to save itself. Help me in order to help you. If you want this country to change, then every one of you must participate to show his desire.”
It is hard to say where ElBaradei’s headfirst plunge into Egyptian politics will lead. He has given voice to the frustration with Egypt’s political, social and economic stagnation in a way that had not been seen since a brief, measured political thaw in 2005. But his early support appears to be primarily among intellectuals and young people, and analysts have questioned whether he will be able to broaden that appeal.
RULING PARTY SHAKEN
If anything concrete has so far emerged from his challenge, political analysts said, it appears that the governing party may be shaken enough that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak will consider running for president again when his term expires in 2011.
There had been widespread speculation that Mubarak, who is 81 and has governed for nearly 29 years, was grooming his younger son, Gamal, to be the candidate of the governing National Democratic Party. But the thinking now is that the younger Mubarak’s credentials could not match ElBaradei’s.
The signs that the elder Mubarak might be changing his mind: He has visited regions around the country recently and the state-run media have begun referencing his electoral platform.
“ElBaradei constitutes a real challenge,” said Mustapha Kamel El Sayed, a political science professor at American University in Cairo. “Not necessarily in terms of his capacity to win an election against the candidate of the National Democratic Party, but in terms of the superiority of his prestige and the respect he has domestically and internationally.”
UNIQUE CHALLENGE
In 2005, under pressure from Washington, the Egyptian government made some effort to improve political freedoms, and the next year it allowed challengers to run against the president in his bid for re-election. Previously the president had run in single candidate “referendums.”
Soon after, however, the political opening evaporated, and in 2007 the state pushed through amendments to the Constitution that effectively made it harder for independents to run for office.
ElBaradei has called on the state to change the Constitution again, a pragmatic first step since under existing law he is unlikely to qualify to run — a fact that he has used, subtly, to embarrass the state.
His decision to plunge into politics presents the government with a unique challenge. He is a former insider, a diplomat who once worked for the foreign service and who hails from the cadre of political elite now in charge.
“He is not a radical and he is not going to change the country’s direction 180 degrees,” said Amr El-Shobaki, a political analyst at the Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies in Cairo. “At the same time, he reveals their mismanagement, the absence of democracy, the arbitrariness of the regime.”
ElBaradei, 67, left his post in December as director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Along with the nuclear agency, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2005. In December, as speculation about ElBaradei’s possible candidacy surfaced, the state media began to attack him. But in the past few weeks, they have largely ignored him, even as he has received tremendous attention from independent media.
If there was any indication of how the governing party might challenge ElBaradei, it was in a front-page opinion piece written by Abdel Moneim Said, chairman of Al Ahram, which publishes the state-owned and widely circulated newspaper of the same name. His article effectively said that while ElBaradei called for change, his ideas were not new, and that many of his facts about the challenges Egypt faces were wrong.
Few expect that to be where the effort to block ElBaradei ends.
“The regime that controls this country is very smart and cunning and sly, and he who thinks otherwise is under an illusion and naive, or it wouldn’t have preserved such a large nation in the refrigerator of stillness and subservience for 30 years,” Magdy el Gallad wrote in the Feb. 23 issue of the independent daily newspaper al-Masry Al-Youm. “As such, it knows how to deal with each opponent or competitor or opposition in a special and different way.”
The only remaining question, Gallad said, was: “How then will the ruling regime burn Mohammed ElBaradei?”
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MONA EL-NAGGAR
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority