The recent assessment by the US Defense Intelligence Agency of Taiwan’s air defense status, which was delivered to Congress on Feb. 16, requires serious reflection and action, both in Taiwan and the US.
The report says there is a serious military imbalance across the Strait, with Taiwan’s fleet consisting of several types of aging aircraft that are in urgent need of upgrades and replenishment. The nation has 60 F-5s that date back to the 1960s, only half of which are reportedly operational; 126 Indigenous Defense Fighters that have limited range and combat capability; 56 Mirage 2000s sold by France in the early 1990s, classified as advanced fighters but extremely expensive to maintain; and 146 F-16 A/B fighters sold by the US in the early 1990s that are in need of upgrades.
Taiwan thus has only about 350 operational fighter aircraft, while — according to a report on China’s military power by the US Department of Defense last year — China has a total of 2,300 fighters and bomber/attack aircraft, 500 of which are stationed directly opposite Taiwan. In addition, China has at least 1,400 missiles aimed at Taiwan. Yet the US is obligated under the Taiwan Relations Act to supply sufficient defensive weaponry to Taiwan to provide for its defense, and China has yet to renounce the use of force to settle the international status of Taiwan’s sovereignty.
A first step to redress the imbalance would be for the US to agree to Taiwan’s request, first made in 2006, to sell Taiwan 66 F-16C/Ds. This would be a sound military move as well as a clear political signal to China that the US does not look kindly on the Chinese military buildup across the Taiwan Strait, which has continued unabated in spite of the “rapprochement” by the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
The administration of US President Barack Obama showed that it is paying close attention to the situation when it approved the arms package announced on Jan. 29, which included PAC-III missiles and Black Hawk helicopters. It now needs to move ahead forthwith on the sale of advanced F-16s, not only because of the abovementioned growing imbalance in air power, but also because of two other important reasons.
First, during its first year in office, the Obama administration did reach out to China and attempted to be accommodating in the hope that China would reciprocate. Instead, China blocked a meaningful agreement at the Copenhagen climate summit, prevented sanctions against Iran from moving forward in the UN and reacted furiously to Obama’s meeting with the Dalai Lama.
In addition, high-level Chinese military officers have threatened sanctions against US companies involved in the arms sales to Taiwan, and even suggested that China should dump its holdings of US Treasury bonds. All this requires a firm response from the US as Chinese aggression against Taiwan will only cease if the Chinese leadership realizes that its relations with the US and Europe will suffer if it perpetuates its hostility.
A second, very practical, reason is that the production of the F-16 is nearing its end, as more countries are switching to the advanced F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. This would necessitate a decision to sell Taiwan the F-16s before the end of the year. A restart of the assembly line at a later date would be prohibitively expensive.
In Taiwan, the defense establishment is eager to move forward, and the Legislative Yuan has also shown strong support for the F-16 package: In a letter to leading members of the US Congress, a bipartisan group of Taiwanese legislators urged the sale “to maintain a viable deterrent fighting force to ensure a balance of power.”
“Our military must be able to defend our airspace, as a further deterioration in the air balance across the Strait will only encourage PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression,” the legislators said in their letter in December.
However, Washington has had some lukewarm and conflicting signals from Taiwan on the issue. The political leadership, from Ma down, needs to make it crystal clear that it does want to move ahead and redress the balance across the Strait before it is too late and they have their backs against the wall. The Obama and Ma administrations must show steadfast resolve on the issue of defensive arms sales to Taiwan, lest risk a misinterpretation by China regarding the peaceful settlement of the Taiwan issue.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS