It was another grandiose Taiwanese political moment and Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) was again there in the midst of it. After years of incompetent rule, the commissioner, with his typical flair for the dramatic, tearfully announced that he would not run for re-election. Why? It wasn’t that he did not want to run; it was just that his party, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), politely refused to let him.
Five crucial elections are coming up this December and the contest for mayor of the newly formed Sinbei City (新北市), the upgraded Taipei County, where Chou would have run, is one of them. The KMT cannot afford to lose any one of the five, but Sinbei City, as the largest administrative district, is certainly the most crucial.
Why did the KMT turn against its incumbent? It wasn’t that he was not loyal. He just happened to be incompetent and unpopular. In polls pitting Chou against any of a half-dozen potential rivals, Chou lost hands down each time.
His approval rating in the county was one of the lowest ever. People are hard-pressed to point to anything of value he has done in his years as commissioner. Yet there was Chou in tears, wondering why the party would not let him run.
This wasn’t Chou’s first dramatic moment. Those who have followed Taiwanese politics over the years remember well his embarrassing TV appearance in 2004. Immediately after the assassination attempt on then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the KMT needed some loyal member to step up and call it a fraud. Chou was up to the task — he appeared on public TV along with a woman who refused to let her face be seen.
They boldly declared that the bullets had come from inside Chen’s jeep. Chou and the woman claimed to have watched the video replay hundreds of times until they discovered that one of the bodyguards in the back of the jeep had moved his shoulder.
That was the fatal give-away, Chou said: That man had fired the shots.
Of course, a short while later, forensic expert Henry Lee (李昌鈺), ironically brought over by the KMT to support Chou, not only found that the bullets came from outside the jeep, but demonstrated the exact trajectory and location of the shot. Yet even without going to such lengths, any analyst looking at the bullet holes in the glass could tell they came from outside.
Only an idiot or blind loyalist would think otherwise. Chou was up to the task. In reward for his loyalty the KMT machine used its extensive resources to help him win the position of Taipei County commissioner.
The tearful drama was not over, however. Enter President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Ma is not only president of the country but also chairman of the KMT and yet in his true “I-don’t-want-to-be-responsible-or-blamed-for-anything” style, he said he knew nothing of Chou being dropped from the ballot until he read it in the paper. And so the soap opera continues: If Chou chose not to run, then why was he in tears? What will he demand in return for his loyalty? Taiwan waits to see with what position the KMT will reward the incompetent Chou.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS