It wasn’t difficult to find out how President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) spent his Lunar New Year holiday. Anyone who browsed news channels over the nine days could easily find Ma criss-crossing the nation, either busily campaigning for Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidates for Saturday’s legislative by-elections or giving away red envelopes containing chocolate gold coins to temple visitors — often with KMT candidates standing close by.
It was festive and appropriate seeing the president spread holiday cheer and send out New Year greetings, but it is disturbing to see him perform his public duty with obvious partisan colors, blurring his roles as president and KMT chairman.
As head of state, where Ma goes and what he does publicly is closely watched by the media. With that in mind, and in view of a slew of gloomy news ahead of and during the holidays, one can’t help but wonder if Ma couldn’t have better spent his time and energy on causes more worthy of public attention rather than concentrating on partisan interests.
According to research conducted by the Taiwan Fund for Children and Families, last year’s economic downturn and the disaster triggered by Typhoon Morakot resulted in an increase in the number of under-privileged families.
Shortly before the Lunar New Year holiday, the non-profit children’s welfare organization estimated that about 50,000 children across the country were likely to spend their holidays with empty stomachs as a result of severe poverty.
The latest information released by the Ministry of the Interior also showed that the number of households below the poverty line has climbed to a record 105,000.
That the figure has exceeded 100,000 households for two consecutive quarters suggests a growing gap between the nation’s rich and poor.
Meanwhile, media also reported another grim figure: Between Feb. 13 — Lunar New Year’s Eve — and last Friday, nine help centers in Taipei County received more than 1,000 calls on their suicide hotlines.
If Ma were to visit children from under-privileged families or the help centers, for example, wouldn’t that be more beneficial in drumming up media coverage of pressing issues than campaigning?
No one ever said being head of a state while doubling as a party chairman was easy. In the past, the KMT — including Ma — often accused then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of blurring the lines between the two roles. After making the same decision, Ma should be all the more careful in drawing a clear distinction between president and chairman in his public appearances if he has any intention of honoring his pledge to be a “people’s president” (全民總統).
On Monday, Ma said he didn’t deserve to be a president if he failed to actualize the goal of signing an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, which he touts as the best way to create economic opportunities for Taiwanese.
Ma would certainly not deserve to be president if — as suggested by his public conduct and rhetoric over the holidays — he cares more about partisan interests than people’s well-being.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS