Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) declared on Monday that the government would not raise National Health Insurance premiums for the time being, dismissing Department of Health Minister Yaung Chih-liang’s (楊志良) comments over the past few weeks that the department would raise premiums this year — possibly before the start of the Lunar New Year holiday.
Criticizing the shortcomings of the DOH’s premium adjustment plan, Wu instructed the department to review its plan, provide more details on remedying the insurance system’s financial woes and ensure that at least half of the population be spared from the planned premium hike. Wu also reminded Yaung to refrain from making public comments before a policy is finalized.
For weeks, Yaung had talked about hiking premiums to help resolve the National Health Insurance Program’s NT$60 billion (US$1.88 billion) deficit. The plan met with wide opposition, however, with many criticizing the government for lacking sensitivity to the plight of the public as the nation struggles to recover from a recession.
Yaung has said the proposal would better address premium payments by different income levels by lowering the insurance premium rate for the bottom 25 percent of the wealth pyramid to 4.5 percent, while raising the rate for those in the top 25 percent to 5.5 percent. Other than telling the public to cough up more money, however, isn’t there a better way for the DOH to fill the gap?
It’s no secret that Taipei owes the national healthcare system more than NT$34 billion, while Kaohsiung owes NT$16 billion — which has taken a heavy toll on the national system. While the Kaohsiung City Government has proposed paying the central government by installment, the Taipei City Government has refused to pay its debt. Wouldn’t it make more sense for the DOH to collect the debt owed by these local governments before going after the public’s hard-earned money?
Maybe Yaung has forgotten his promise when he assumed the DOH post last August. “The Taipei City Government must pay its debt or the National Health Insurance’s finances will collapse sooner or later,” he said at the time, adding that the city’s debt was the bureau’s biggest problem.
Wu’s intervention was welcomed as he asked the DOH to thoroughly assess ways to reform the insurance system and seek other ways to resolve its financial problems before forcing the public to cover its debts.
The premier’s statement should be read carefully, however, because he did not promise that there would be no increase in the insurance premium, but rather that the rate adjustment would be put off “for the time being.”
With the month-end’s legislative by-elections looming, a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators had slammed Yaung’s planned premium hike, saying it would hurt the party’s electoral showing. One can’t help but wonder then if the premier’s announcement of a temporary halt in plans to raise premiums was done out of concern for public welfare — or the KMT’s?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS