After two companies were investigated by prosecutors in Kaohsiung City recently for providing incinerator operators with low-grade activated carbon — used to absorb dioxin emissions during waste incineration — the plans current Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) had as chief of the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) to build an incineration plant in each city and county have once again received a lot of attention. The EPA hoped to build 36 incinerators around the country capable of handling 24,000 tonnes of trash per day. Because of doubts expressed by environmental protection groups, experts and academics and protests from local residents, however, plans to build some of the incineration plants were canceled.
EPA statistics show that the 24 incineration plants now operating around the country are capable of handling approximately 20,000 tonnes of trash per day. There is a trash recycling rate of about 30 percent because of government enforced recycling and an increased public awareness. The statistics also show that the trash produced by each Taiwanese per day has dropped to 0.5kg, creating a total of approximately 13,000 tonnes of trash daily.
Government policy is that recycling rates are expected to reach 40 percent by next year. That should mean that the trash produced in Taiwan daily would drop to about 10,000 tonnes per day and most of the incinerators would run out of trash to burn.
The contracts for incineration plants built as BOT projects state that the government must pay operators NT$2,500 per tonne of trash that each plant is certified to handle, even if there isn’t that much trash. To use the BOT incinerator project in Linnei (林內) Township, Yunlin County, as an example, former Yunlin County commissioner Chang Jung-wei (張榮味) signed a contract with the operator guaranteeing 600 tonnes of trash per day for incineration. This implies that the government must pay the operator a total of NT$1.5 million per day, more than NT$500 million a year, in trash disposal fees. This contract was signed for a period of 20 years, even though the daily amount of trash in Yunlin County is currently only 300 tonnes.
The recent report about low-grade activated carbon also dealt a severe blow to the EPA’s ability to monitor incinerator operations. It clearly shows that the government does not know how to control and test dioxin emissions at incinerators and that operators were using activated carbon of poor quality for as long as six years without the authorities finding out. The EPA needs to reassess its policies for monitoring and managing incineration plants.
Incineration is not the best way to handle trash. Apart from the dioxins produced during incineration, other poisonous gasses are also emitted. When we burn trash, it doesn’t just disappear, it is merely transformed into pollutants that are smaller and harder to see. Heavy metals are an example of substances that cannot be disposed of via incineration. Such substances must be sent to special landfill sites for disposal.
Last year, a scandal erupted surrounding dioxin-contaminated ducks. It was caused by illegal disposed dust and slag.
The real source of trash is unbridled consumption. Mass consumption and unbalanced lifestyles waste money for everyone and damage the environment. Politicians should see the bigger picture instead of blindly and persistently encouraging people to consume more and forgetting the high price we all have to pay.
As long as the government fails to clear up the contradictions and inconsistencies of its policies, we must become more responsible and smarter as consumers.
Chang Hung-lin is chairperson of the Green Party Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS