The Control Yuan moved to impeach Prosecutor-General Chen Tsung-ming (陳聰明), hoping to secure rapid disciplinary action. Chen circumvented the issue by resigning not long after the impeachment motion was passed. This solved the problem for Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Ma, who was facing criticism from supporters for not moving quickly enough on Chen, dealt with his resignation summarily. And with that, he drew a line under the whole sorry affair.
Nothing that Chen has been involved in since he took up his position has attracted so much attention as the corruption case brought against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Ironically enough, it was the attention that this case attracted that led to Chen Tsung-ming’s stepping down, a victim of association with a persona non grata.
Heading the prosecutorial system is sure to attract court attention. The director-general is expected to have legal expertise and a wealth of experience to draw on, but there are other indispensable aspects to the job: integrity, morals and an untarnished image. The Control Yuan’s decision to impeach Chen Tsung-ming made his position untenable, so his resignation was no surprise. Politicians of all stripes differed on whether they had the political authority to get involved in the impeachment case, but they did agree on one thing — there was much reluctance to commend Chen Tsung-ming on his performance.
That does not necessarily mean it was right to topple Chen Tsung-ming. It also leads to another question: What is to be done about the long-term malaise afflicting the prosecutorial system?
Problems are rife: leaking confidential information and thereby compromising procedural integrity during investigations; indiscriminate prosecution, especially if a court hands down an inconvenient non-guilty verdict in the first instance; pandering to the media when choosing whom to prosecute; and tailoring one’s conduct to the media, playing to its whims and courting favor by subscribing to a pro-blue agenda, without due regard to getting to the truth of the case. All these actions compromise the credibility of the system. Each one of them will have to be addressed if we are to reform the judicial system.
Ma came into office on the promise of such reform. He is almost halfway through his term and he has done nothing to that end. To date, the only evidence of his promised reform has been to install computer screens outside the court so people can have access to the interrogation transcripts. And even this has nothing to do with Ma.
Wang is never out of the news, talking about the state of the prosecutorial system and how she will make sure things get done soon. It’s a shame. This kind of talk, followed by an endless stream of reports, sounds hollower as time goes on.
If Wang doesn’t do anything positive soon, people are going to lose hope that reform will ever materialize.
The Control Yuan has succeeded in getting Chen Tsung-ming to step down. However, the problems inherent in the prosecutorial system will not disappear with him. If these are not addressed, it will be impossible to restore credibility in the system.
It is true, as Wang has said, that Chen Tsung-ming ‘s conduct damaged the system, but it will take more than just words to fix it. She is still at a loss with what to do about existing problems. I’m afraid this is not simply going to add to Ma’s problems, it might even be the end of him.
Of course, reform does not just stop at ousting Chen Tsung-ming. There is a lot more work to do if we are to repair the damage that has been done.
Lin Feng-jeng is executive director of the Judicial Reform Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS