Taiwan’s hard-won democracy is backsliding following two recent moves by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in his quest for re-election.
The Ma administration’s handling of the Local Government Act and the Control Yuan’s impeachment of Prosecutor-General Chen Tsung-ming (陳聰明) reflect Ma’s electoral calculations.
Ever since he took office, Ma has relied on four pillars. One is the fact that he received 58 percent of the vote in the presidential election. The second is that he fast-tracked the cross-strait economic opening to fulfill his campaign pledges. The third is his appeal for a “diplomatic truce” with Beijing to erase Taiwan’s image as what Ma calls a “troublemaker” and build healthy US-Taiwan relations. The last one is his campaign against corruption, mainly in the form of the indictment and trial of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Yet the first three pillars have collapsed as a result of Ma’s inability to boost the economy and rein in unemployment, and the government’s bungling of the response to Typhoon Morakot in August.
While Taipei and Beijing have refrained from buying out each other’s diplomatic allies and Taiwan was able to attend the most recent World Health Assembly (WHA) as “Chinese Taipei,” Taipei is still excluded from this year’s Executive Committee as an observer. This raises the question of whether China has set conditions for allowing Taiwan more room for international participation.
US-Taiwan relations also suffered after the KMT-controlled legislature revised the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) to block imports of some US beef products.
Washington accused Taipei of unilaterally violating the beef protocol signed by the two countries.
With three of his pillars having collapsed and following his party’s disappointing performance in the legislative by-elections in Yunlin County in September, the three-in-one local elections in December and the three legislative by-elections earlier this month, it’s no surprise that would Ma resort to the only tactic left to him — utilizing the case against Chen Shui-bian to consolidate his core supporters in the pan-blue camp.
Ma said after the by-election that the major reason for the KMT’s poor showing was the government’s failure to impeach Chen Tsung-ming for his “inappropriate behavior” after it emerged that he and then-minister of justice Shih Mao-lin (施茂林) were invited by Huang Fang-yen (黃芳彥), the former first family’s physician, to meet at Huang’s residence on Feb. 26, 2007.
Since Chen Tsung-ming was appointed by Chen Shui-bian, Ma blamed the KMT’s electoral woes on the prosecutor-general for not pursuing the former president’s case vigorously enough.
The initial impeachment vote against Chen Tsung-ming failed, but after Ma linked the KMT’s troubles to Chen Tsung-ming, the Control Yuan passed the impeachment.
The prosecutor-general did in fact do some inappropriate things. But the timing of the Control Yuan’s second decision coincided with Ma’s calls for speeding up the case against Chen Shui-bian.
This raised the question of whether Ma was interfering in the judicial process and the Control Yuan’s jurisdiction and therefore undermined judicial independence and democracy.
The KMT’s last-minute maneuver to revise the Local Government Act, meanwhile, is a threat to the public’s right to vote and be elected to office for fixed terms.
The original version, backed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), stipulated that township and village chiefs and councilors should step down once the new special municipality mayors are inaugurated. The chiefs and councilors were to be replaced by civil service appointees. The term of those local chiefs and councilors would in fact be extended for another year after their four-year term is up.
The new version, supported by nearly three fourths of KMT legislators — under direct orders from Ma as KMT chairman — allows 56 township chiefs to continue in office as appointed political officials for up to four more years. They cannot be dismissed by the incoming mayors.
Local politicians who were elected in December 2005 for four year terms, most of whom are affiliated with the KMT’s local roots, will hold their positions for up to nine years.
Again, the timing of this about-face was controversial and aimed at mobilizing KMT’s grass-roots vote.
Ma is pursuing a personal agenda at the expense of judicial independence and democracy. The question is: Should — and will — Taiwanese voters allow that?
Liu Shih-chung is a political commentator based in Taipei.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS