Taiwan’s hard-won democracy is backsliding following two recent moves by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in his quest for re-election.
The Ma administration’s handling of the Local Government Act and the Control Yuan’s impeachment of Prosecutor-General Chen Tsung-ming (陳聰明) reflect Ma’s electoral calculations.
Ever since he took office, Ma has relied on four pillars. One is the fact that he received 58 percent of the vote in the presidential election. The second is that he fast-tracked the cross-strait economic opening to fulfill his campaign pledges. The third is his appeal for a “diplomatic truce” with Beijing to erase Taiwan’s image as what Ma calls a “troublemaker” and build healthy US-Taiwan relations. The last one is his campaign against corruption, mainly in the form of the indictment and trial of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Yet the first three pillars have collapsed as a result of Ma’s inability to boost the economy and rein in unemployment, and the government’s bungling of the response to Typhoon Morakot in August.
While Taipei and Beijing have refrained from buying out each other’s diplomatic allies and Taiwan was able to attend the most recent World Health Assembly (WHA) as “Chinese Taipei,” Taipei is still excluded from this year’s Executive Committee as an observer. This raises the question of whether China has set conditions for allowing Taiwan more room for international participation.
US-Taiwan relations also suffered after the KMT-controlled legislature revised the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) to block imports of some US beef products.
Washington accused Taipei of unilaterally violating the beef protocol signed by the two countries.
With three of his pillars having collapsed and following his party’s disappointing performance in the legislative by-elections in Yunlin County in September, the three-in-one local elections in December and the three legislative by-elections earlier this month, it’s no surprise that would Ma resort to the only tactic left to him — utilizing the case against Chen Shui-bian to consolidate his core supporters in the pan-blue camp.
Ma said after the by-election that the major reason for the KMT’s poor showing was the government’s failure to impeach Chen Tsung-ming for his “inappropriate behavior” after it emerged that he and then-minister of justice Shih Mao-lin (施茂林) were invited by Huang Fang-yen (黃芳彥), the former first family’s physician, to meet at Huang’s residence on Feb. 26, 2007.
Since Chen Tsung-ming was appointed by Chen Shui-bian, Ma blamed the KMT’s electoral woes on the prosecutor-general for not pursuing the former president’s case vigorously enough.
The initial impeachment vote against Chen Tsung-ming failed, but after Ma linked the KMT’s troubles to Chen Tsung-ming, the Control Yuan passed the impeachment.
The prosecutor-general did in fact do some inappropriate things. But the timing of the Control Yuan’s second decision coincided with Ma’s calls for speeding up the case against Chen Shui-bian.
This raised the question of whether Ma was interfering in the judicial process and the Control Yuan’s jurisdiction and therefore undermined judicial independence and democracy.
The KMT’s last-minute maneuver to revise the Local Government Act, meanwhile, is a threat to the public’s right to vote and be elected to office for fixed terms.
The original version, backed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), stipulated that township and village chiefs and councilors should step down once the new special municipality mayors are inaugurated. The chiefs and councilors were to be replaced by civil service appointees. The term of those local chiefs and councilors would in fact be extended for another year after their four-year term is up.
The new version, supported by nearly three fourths of KMT legislators — under direct orders from Ma as KMT chairman — allows 56 township chiefs to continue in office as appointed political officials for up to four more years. They cannot be dismissed by the incoming mayors.
Local politicians who were elected in December 2005 for four year terms, most of whom are affiliated with the KMT’s local roots, will hold their positions for up to nine years.
Again, the timing of this about-face was controversial and aimed at mobilizing KMT’s grass-roots vote.
Ma is pursuing a personal agenda at the expense of judicial independence and democracy. The question is: Should — and will — Taiwanese voters allow that?
Liu Shih-chung is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS