Taiwan’s hard-won democracy is backsliding following two recent moves by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in his quest for re-election.
The Ma administration’s handling of the Local Government Act and the Control Yuan’s impeachment of Prosecutor-General Chen Tsung-ming (陳聰明) reflect Ma’s electoral calculations.
Ever since he took office, Ma has relied on four pillars. One is the fact that he received 58 percent of the vote in the presidential election. The second is that he fast-tracked the cross-strait economic opening to fulfill his campaign pledges. The third is his appeal for a “diplomatic truce” with Beijing to erase Taiwan’s image as what Ma calls a “troublemaker” and build healthy US-Taiwan relations. The last one is his campaign against corruption, mainly in the form of the indictment and trial of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Yet the first three pillars have collapsed as a result of Ma’s inability to boost the economy and rein in unemployment, and the government’s bungling of the response to Typhoon Morakot in August.
While Taipei and Beijing have refrained from buying out each other’s diplomatic allies and Taiwan was able to attend the most recent World Health Assembly (WHA) as “Chinese Taipei,” Taipei is still excluded from this year’s Executive Committee as an observer. This raises the question of whether China has set conditions for allowing Taiwan more room for international participation.
US-Taiwan relations also suffered after the KMT-controlled legislature revised the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) to block imports of some US beef products.
Washington accused Taipei of unilaterally violating the beef protocol signed by the two countries.
With three of his pillars having collapsed and following his party’s disappointing performance in the legislative by-elections in Yunlin County in September, the three-in-one local elections in December and the three legislative by-elections earlier this month, it’s no surprise that would Ma resort to the only tactic left to him — utilizing the case against Chen Shui-bian to consolidate his core supporters in the pan-blue camp.
Ma said after the by-election that the major reason for the KMT’s poor showing was the government’s failure to impeach Chen Tsung-ming for his “inappropriate behavior” after it emerged that he and then-minister of justice Shih Mao-lin (施茂林) were invited by Huang Fang-yen (黃芳彥), the former first family’s physician, to meet at Huang’s residence on Feb. 26, 2007.
Since Chen Tsung-ming was appointed by Chen Shui-bian, Ma blamed the KMT’s electoral woes on the prosecutor-general for not pursuing the former president’s case vigorously enough.
The initial impeachment vote against Chen Tsung-ming failed, but after Ma linked the KMT’s troubles to Chen Tsung-ming, the Control Yuan passed the impeachment.
The prosecutor-general did in fact do some inappropriate things. But the timing of the Control Yuan’s second decision coincided with Ma’s calls for speeding up the case against Chen Shui-bian.
This raised the question of whether Ma was interfering in the judicial process and the Control Yuan’s jurisdiction and therefore undermined judicial independence and democracy.
The KMT’s last-minute maneuver to revise the Local Government Act, meanwhile, is a threat to the public’s right to vote and be elected to office for fixed terms.
The original version, backed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), stipulated that township and village chiefs and councilors should step down once the new special municipality mayors are inaugurated. The chiefs and councilors were to be replaced by civil service appointees. The term of those local chiefs and councilors would in fact be extended for another year after their four-year term is up.
The new version, supported by nearly three fourths of KMT legislators — under direct orders from Ma as KMT chairman — allows 56 township chiefs to continue in office as appointed political officials for up to four more years. They cannot be dismissed by the incoming mayors.
Local politicians who were elected in December 2005 for four year terms, most of whom are affiliated with the KMT’s local roots, will hold their positions for up to nine years.
Again, the timing of this about-face was controversial and aimed at mobilizing KMT’s grass-roots vote.
Ma is pursuing a personal agenda at the expense of judicial independence and democracy. The question is: Should — and will — Taiwanese voters allow that?
Liu Shih-chung is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS