The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost all three legislative by-elections on Saturday. Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said he feels “great” about his four-pronged strategy for dealing with adversity — deal with problems calmly, learn from mistakes, pursue reforms and make progress — he may have a hard time swallowing this latest bad news. Although he launched party reforms after the KMT did poorly in local elections last month, this latest blow casts doubt on whether Ma, as KMT chairman, understands what the problem is.
The KMT was the obvious underdog on Saturday. Each of the by-elections was necessitated by its own legislators and voters had cause to be displeased. In Taichung and Taoyuan counties, two KMT legislators had lost their seats because of vote buying. The Taitung County by-election had to be held because KMT legislator Justin Huang (黃健庭) had resigned to run for Taitung county commissioner in last month’s election.
That decision was dogged by claims, however, that Huang and the KMT candidate who ran for his seat — and who was Huang’s predecessor as county commissioner — Kuang Li-chen (鄺麗貞) had struck a deal to switch jobs. Given the scandal surrounding Kuang’s official trips abroad and her implication in corruption proceedings against her husband Wu Chun-li (吳俊立), all three defeats were a warning from voters to the KMT.
The public’s displeasure was compounded by the government’s handling of the US beef issue, the (A)H1N1 vaccine and the proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China.
Although KMT legislators opposed the government over the beef protocol, neither the Presidential Office nor the Cabinet reviewed its approach. This has put off voters, KMT members and the US alike. Such behavior can easily spark a backlash among swing voters or even cause dedicated KMT supporters to abstain from voting.
The KMT has not been sincere about reform. The party’s promises concerning its controversial assets have yet to materialize. Local factions still have too much sway in the nomination of candidates. Such reform is unlikely to mobilize party members and convince voters.
Compared with the last legislative polls, the three KMT candidates lost between 10,000 and 30,000 votes each this weekend. The DPP candidates not only retained their support base, but votes for Lai Kun-cheng (賴坤成) in Taitung County and Chien Chao-tung (簡肇棟) in Taichung County rose slightly. The KMT lost base support because of low turnout.
With three new legislators, the DPP finally has enough seats to propose to amend the Constitution or impeach the president. As the KMT retains a strong majority, however, the significance of this victory is symbolic. The DPP seems to have emerged from the shadow of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his administration’s poor performance.
Ma, meanwhile, is faced with a challenge. There are rumblings of dissent from within his party and faith in his leadership is faltering in Beijing and internationally. Ma has to adjust how he runs his government, step up party reform and heed public opinion. If he doesn’t, he will be looking at a similar setback in the four legislative by-elections next month and the special municipality elections at the end of the year.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS