The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost all three legislative by-elections on Saturday. Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said he feels “great” about his four-pronged strategy for dealing with adversity — deal with problems calmly, learn from mistakes, pursue reforms and make progress — he may have a hard time swallowing this latest bad news. Although he launched party reforms after the KMT did poorly in local elections last month, this latest blow casts doubt on whether Ma, as KMT chairman, understands what the problem is.
The KMT was the obvious underdog on Saturday. Each of the by-elections was necessitated by its own legislators and voters had cause to be displeased. In Taichung and Taoyuan counties, two KMT legislators had lost their seats because of vote buying. The Taitung County by-election had to be held because KMT legislator Justin Huang (黃健庭) had resigned to run for Taitung county commissioner in last month’s election.
That decision was dogged by claims, however, that Huang and the KMT candidate who ran for his seat — and who was Huang’s predecessor as county commissioner — Kuang Li-chen (鄺麗貞) had struck a deal to switch jobs. Given the scandal surrounding Kuang’s official trips abroad and her implication in corruption proceedings against her husband Wu Chun-li (吳俊立), all three defeats were a warning from voters to the KMT.
The public’s displeasure was compounded by the government’s handling of the US beef issue, the (A)H1N1 vaccine and the proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China.
Although KMT legislators opposed the government over the beef protocol, neither the Presidential Office nor the Cabinet reviewed its approach. This has put off voters, KMT members and the US alike. Such behavior can easily spark a backlash among swing voters or even cause dedicated KMT supporters to abstain from voting.
The KMT has not been sincere about reform. The party’s promises concerning its controversial assets have yet to materialize. Local factions still have too much sway in the nomination of candidates. Such reform is unlikely to mobilize party members and convince voters.
Compared with the last legislative polls, the three KMT candidates lost between 10,000 and 30,000 votes each this weekend. The DPP candidates not only retained their support base, but votes for Lai Kun-cheng (賴坤成) in Taitung County and Chien Chao-tung (簡肇棟) in Taichung County rose slightly. The KMT lost base support because of low turnout.
With three new legislators, the DPP finally has enough seats to propose to amend the Constitution or impeach the president. As the KMT retains a strong majority, however, the significance of this victory is symbolic. The DPP seems to have emerged from the shadow of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his administration’s poor performance.
Ma, meanwhile, is faced with a challenge. There are rumblings of dissent from within his party and faith in his leadership is faltering in Beijing and internationally. Ma has to adjust how he runs his government, step up party reform and heed public opinion. If he doesn’t, he will be looking at a similar setback in the four legislative by-elections next month and the special municipality elections at the end of the year.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS