USconsumers have been led for years to believe that California cows are happy, which is why many were sickened when images surfaced of a washed-up milker, too weak to stagger to slaughter, rolled, pushed and run over by a forklift operator.
The suffering cow, covertly taped by The Humane Society of the United States, prompted the biggest beef recall in US history and contributed to sweeping legislation over the past 13 months designed to improve the lives of farm animals. But more important for farmers, it awakened the masses to the stark reality for many animals raised for food.
In October, as the animal protection organization taped workers at a Vermont veal slaughterhouse kicking and shocking day-old calves, the National Milk Producers Federation began urging dairy operators to participate in a new standard-of-care program it is launching next month.
The federation figures that self-imposed regulations are better than having The Humane Society of the United States force them on the industry through referendums like the one it championed in California that banned cramped cages for chickens, pigs and veal calves.
“Clearly the animal rights community is much more emboldened and aggressive than they have been in the past,” federation spokesman Chris Galen said. “We need to play offense.”
The protocols in the National Dairy Farm Program are a check list for everything from providing clean drinking water to foot care to euthanasia. The idea is that milk processors whose dairy operators are shown to follow the guidelines will be able to assure restaurants and supermarket chains that their products are cruelty free, something consumers are becoming conditioned to demand.
After watching the Humane Society shepherd laws in six states to keep animals out of cramped cages, dairy marketing officials are preparing for scrutiny. They believe the Humane Society-led ban this year on tail docking at dairies in California, the nation’s No. 1 dairy state, signaled a new focus on the milk industry.
“All of these things are harbingers of a different environment,” Galen said. “A whole variety of things are changing in society.”
That change has come over several years on multiple fronts: food movements that encourage consumers to connect with local farmers; authors such as Michael Pollan who write about the politics and processes of factory farming and food safety issues; and a Humane Society president, Wayne Pacelle, who believes that the collective level of suffering among the nation’s 10 billion farm animals exceeds all others.
The organization stops short of calling for the elimination of factory farms.
“It’s not a matter of creating Old McDonald’s-type conditions,” said Paul Shapiro, who heads the nonprofit’s End Factory Farming campaign. “Our goal is to reduce the suffering these animals endure.”
California’s Proposition 2, last year’s ballot initiative that will free egg-laying chickens from cages by 2015, marked the animal protection group’s most public and successful foray from its historic campaigns to stop the clubbing of baby seals in Canada and dog fighting and puppy mills in the US.
The landslide victory came despite threats of higher prices — anywhere from a penny an egg more to 25 percent more per carton.
The animal welfare group has convinced some of the country’s largest users — fast food restaurants such as Wendy’s, Burger King, Starbucks and Dennys, and retailers such as Safeway and Costco — to make at least a gradual switch to cage-free eggs. Red Robin will go totally cage-free by the end of next year.
When the International House of Pancakes refused in September, the Humane Society unleashed 11 million letter-writing members and recorded a commercial with HBO’s Bill Maher, who dubbed the California-based chain the “International House of Pain.”
By this month, the pancake chain promised to “begin testing” the use of cage-free eggs.
A staff of 30 attorneys — up from three when Wayne Pacelle took the helm five years ago — file lawsuits against factory farming operations they believe operate outside of the law on everything from pollution to potential price fixing.
In an effort to make factory farming less appealing, they petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency in September to force emissions from the manure at confined animals operations such as dairies to comply with the Clean Air Act.
The clout amassed by the organization with a US$157 million annual budget means it can sometimes score victories without mounting a fight.
In Michigan, lawmakers and the agriculture industry agreed this year to Proposition 2-type legislation when the Humane Society threatened a statewide initiative. Maine passed a similar bill. And in March, the federal government outlawed the use of cows that cannot stand for food, a direct result of the cow and the forklift.
The society is now gearing up in Ohio for a November 2010 initiative similar to Proposition 2. Pacelle said the agriculture industry “dug in its heels” and decided to fight rather than negotiate.
Until now, farmers have been on the defensive, arguing in costly elections that they are not as they have been portrayed, and that the videos showing abuse are isolated incidents.
Then, in October, United Egg Producers paid for journalists from across the country to travel to Colorado to tour an egg farm and discuss post-Proposition 2 legislation and “the ethics of large-scale animal agriculture.”
Dairymen also aren’t waiting for the Humane Society’s next move.
Last month, the California Milk Advisory Board released 15 mini-documentaries on its Web site, viewed 95,000 times so far, showing the lives of farmers. As the sun rises, multigenerational dairymen in idyllic settings talk about the affection they have for cows and the family members with whom they work.
“Each one is ... dispelling the myth that California farms are run by cold, uncaring ‘corporations,’” said Michael Freeman, the board’s vice president of advertising.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
RSS