The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) poor showing in the recent elections has raised eyebrows in Beijing, suggesting there is a rather shaky patch in cross-strait relations ahead.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) also made a careless error in a Wall Street Journal Asia interview, saying he would not discuss unification with China during this term; his policy could be summed up as the “three noes” — no unification, no independence and no use of force — and maintaining the “status quo.” He then said there was not much support for unification in Taiwan, adding that the public should be given the time “to decide what to do.”
This was met with an unusally quick response from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, which declared that it would do everything in its to power to seek complete national unification — a position, it said, that had always remained unchanged.
Chinese leaders discussed the uncertainty surrounding Taiwan’s political situation last month and concluded that they needed to be flexible in response. China wants to open discussions on the subject after talks on an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA), hoping to sign a memorandum similar to the one dealing with a cross-strait peace agreement by 2012. So who would have thought the election results would have caused such anxiety in Beijing, or that Ma would turn his attention to reinforcing relations with the US and Japan and away from his position on China.
Ma is between a rock and a hard place. CommonWealth Magazine reported that 61 percent of the public are concerned about being overly reliant on China and 78 percent want the “status quo,” while the government’s disapproval rating rose to 66 percent.
Public opinion, then, is not merely moving toward support for independence, it is also showing distinct disappointment in Ma’s 600 days in power, during which he has had complete control over the government and the legislature. The coming legislative by-elections and five special metropolitan elections will be a real test, with implications for Ma’s re-election effort in 2012. No wonder Beijing’s faith in Ma has been shaken.
Even so, Ma has not lost his airs, despite his lack of presidential gravitas. He seems to think that all he has to do is fly the flag of reform and crank up the public relations machine. It has yet to dawn on him that when you have total control over government, you cannot keep spouting soundbites while failing to deliver.
From the outset Ma has blamed his problems on wider political circumstances or the previous administration. More and more, however, he is falling short of public expectations. More than half of the public doubt that he can get rid of money politics, reform the KMT or put a dent in corruption. He has offered little more than a symbolic nod to returning KMT assets to the national coffers. The elections were therefore nothing if not a clear warning.
Cross-strait relations used to be driven by Beijing. Nowadays, the impetus comes from Ma’s deficit in public trust, which poses several challenges to cross-strait policy. Taiwanese are calling for a greater say in matters that affect them, and calls for referendums should be read as a warning that the public lacks faith in the Ma administration.
As Charles W. Kegley, Jr, vice chairman of the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs in New York, recently put it, don’t put your cards on the table too early during economic and trade negotiations. He warned against confusing talks with economic negotiations; after all, trade is trade and politics is politics.
If we need an example of this, look no further than recent cross-strait talks. And if the government loses its focus, the result could be political rallies.
Lu I-ming is a former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS