In the local government elections on Dec 5, voters taught the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) a lesson. A majority of the public and international media got the message voters wanted to express. Ma experienced the largest setback since taking office as his policies and governance were rejected by voters. Foreign news reports said Ma was the main loser in the elections. Ma, however, has completely ignored the message, continues to shirk his responsibility and is unwilling to accept defeat. He has blamed the “less than ideal” election results on the sluggish economy. This president, who does not accept losses or face up to his mistakes will be punished again in future elections, but what we should be concerned about is whether Ma in his remaining two years in office will continue to blindly and arrogantly persist in his errors, leading Taiwan on a course to destruction.
There are two main reasons for the Ma administration’s defeat. The first is the sluggish economy, record unemployment, and the daily hardship and dissatisfaction throughout Taiwan. The second is the government’s leaning toward China, almost unilaterally pushing Taiwan’s businesses, capital, manpower and technical know-how toward China and handing it control over the economy.
These reasons are closely related and mutually reinforcing, but the real problem is the government’s China policies. In other words, Ma’s idea of eventual unification could cause such a catastrophe as to erode Taiwan’s successes and progress to date.
Observers have long since concluded that the reason for Ma’s failure lies in his China policies. As soon as the election results were finalized, Reuter’s reports said the polls were the first test of Ma’s China policies and that the KMT lost to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The Associated Press said that ahead of the fourth meeting between Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), the election results sent a strong warning to Ma regarding his pro-China policies.
The Japanese-language Asahi Shimbun reported that the election reflected the pervasive concerns in Taiwan about Ma and his increasingly China-leaning policies. Another Japanese-language newspaper, the Yomiuri, said the KMT could no longer afford to ignore the public’s fear and suspicion toward China. Apart from international media outlets, senior members of the pan-blue camp warned that the government would suffer more bitter losses if it fails to review its pro-China policies.
This interpretation of public opinion is common in both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps as well as overseas. Yet even if everyone understands this, it means nothing if Ma sticks to his dream of eventual unification. Many people thought the poor election results would make Ma realize that his China policies are disastrous and that he must return to his promises of putting Taiwan and its people first. But Ma seems to believe there is nothing wrong with his policies. It looks as though he will continue to blame the election results on the economy, while opening Taiwan up to China and pandering to the Chinese Communist Party. Ma does not deserve our pity if he sticks to his plans and ruins his and the KMT’s political future. Innocent Taiwanese and future generations will have to live with the consequences of his actions.
It is worrying that China’s efforts to make Taiwan economically dependent are beginning to work. The Ma administration is becoming addicted to the bogus economic benefits China offers. The KMT’s poor election results will only make Ma more dependent on this and make voters spurn his government even more. The Ma government will then need more assistance from China to uphold its shaky rule.
China, which has full control of its unification strategies, will not let this chance pass by. It will “dispense” more economic “drugs” to keep the Ma administration in its control. These are not unfounded statements.
After the elections, the government said cross-strait policies would remain unchanged and that consensus had been reached, which means that upstream Taiwanese makers of flat panel displays, 12-inch wafer fabs and petrochemical companies will be allowed to move to China.
Given these circumstances, China could send large numbers of tour groups to Taiwan as in February and March when Ma’s approval rating reached record lows. Sending tourist groups and purchasing delegations to Taiwan would put on a show about how much money China can bring to Taiwan, thus boosting Ma’s approval ratings.
It is apparent that the election results have not changed Ma. The government is struggling and views China as its only savior. It is not interested in examining its mistakes, but thinks pinning all hopes on China is the solution.
The meeting between Chiang and Chen in Taichung will be a closed door meeting in which the two sides will comfort each other. Voters will spurn a party that constantly acts against public opinion. However, judging from Ma’s post-election comments, he will not change.
We urge Ma to renounce his pro-China policies and keep his promises about putting Taiwan and its people first. This is the only hope the KMT has if it wants to avoid even larger losses in future elections.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS