In the local government elections on Dec 5, voters taught the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) a lesson. A majority of the public and international media got the message voters wanted to express. Ma experienced the largest setback since taking office as his policies and governance were rejected by voters. Foreign news reports said Ma was the main loser in the elections. Ma, however, has completely ignored the message, continues to shirk his responsibility and is unwilling to accept defeat. He has blamed the “less than ideal” election results on the sluggish economy. This president, who does not accept losses or face up to his mistakes will be punished again in future elections, but what we should be concerned about is whether Ma in his remaining two years in office will continue to blindly and arrogantly persist in his errors, leading Taiwan on a course to destruction.
There are two main reasons for the Ma administration’s defeat. The first is the sluggish economy, record unemployment, and the daily hardship and dissatisfaction throughout Taiwan. The second is the government’s leaning toward China, almost unilaterally pushing Taiwan’s businesses, capital, manpower and technical know-how toward China and handing it control over the economy.
These reasons are closely related and mutually reinforcing, but the real problem is the government’s China policies. In other words, Ma’s idea of eventual unification could cause such a catastrophe as to erode Taiwan’s successes and progress to date.
Observers have long since concluded that the reason for Ma’s failure lies in his China policies. As soon as the election results were finalized, Reuter’s reports said the polls were the first test of Ma’s China policies and that the KMT lost to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The Associated Press said that ahead of the fourth meeting between Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), the election results sent a strong warning to Ma regarding his pro-China policies.
The Japanese-language Asahi Shimbun reported that the election reflected the pervasive concerns in Taiwan about Ma and his increasingly China-leaning policies. Another Japanese-language newspaper, the Yomiuri, said the KMT could no longer afford to ignore the public’s fear and suspicion toward China. Apart from international media outlets, senior members of the pan-blue camp warned that the government would suffer more bitter losses if it fails to review its pro-China policies.
This interpretation of public opinion is common in both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps as well as overseas. Yet even if everyone understands this, it means nothing if Ma sticks to his dream of eventual unification. Many people thought the poor election results would make Ma realize that his China policies are disastrous and that he must return to his promises of putting Taiwan and its people first. But Ma seems to believe there is nothing wrong with his policies. It looks as though he will continue to blame the election results on the economy, while opening Taiwan up to China and pandering to the Chinese Communist Party. Ma does not deserve our pity if he sticks to his plans and ruins his and the KMT’s political future. Innocent Taiwanese and future generations will have to live with the consequences of his actions.
It is worrying that China’s efforts to make Taiwan economically dependent are beginning to work. The Ma administration is becoming addicted to the bogus economic benefits China offers. The KMT’s poor election results will only make Ma more dependent on this and make voters spurn his government even more. The Ma government will then need more assistance from China to uphold its shaky rule.
China, which has full control of its unification strategies, will not let this chance pass by. It will “dispense” more economic “drugs” to keep the Ma administration in its control. These are not unfounded statements.
After the elections, the government said cross-strait policies would remain unchanged and that consensus had been reached, which means that upstream Taiwanese makers of flat panel displays, 12-inch wafer fabs and petrochemical companies will be allowed to move to China.
Given these circumstances, China could send large numbers of tour groups to Taiwan as in February and March when Ma’s approval rating reached record lows. Sending tourist groups and purchasing delegations to Taiwan would put on a show about how much money China can bring to Taiwan, thus boosting Ma’s approval ratings.
It is apparent that the election results have not changed Ma. The government is struggling and views China as its only savior. It is not interested in examining its mistakes, but thinks pinning all hopes on China is the solution.
The meeting between Chiang and Chen in Taichung will be a closed door meeting in which the two sides will comfort each other. Voters will spurn a party that constantly acts against public opinion. However, judging from Ma’s post-election comments, he will not change.
We urge Ma to renounce his pro-China policies and keep his promises about putting Taiwan and its people first. This is the only hope the KMT has if it wants to avoid even larger losses in future elections.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS