J. on Joe
Dear Johnny,
Normally I quite enjoy reading your column, since you try to be more or less neutral and are not afraid to attack stupidity in both camps (green and blue). So I was slightly disappointed to read your column about the appointment of Joe Hung (洪健昭) as chief of the Central News Agency (“Cuff him, Danno ... oh ... use mine,” Dec. 12, page 8).
I do not like the deep blue thinking in some of Mr Hung’s articles, but your criticism of the political dimension of this appointment amounts to a double standard. Mr Hung’s predecessor was Mr Su Tseng-ping (蘇正平), well known for his affilation to the green camp and even Government Information Office chief under former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) before that.
I don’t remember you criticizing Su’s appointment. So come on, Johnny — you can do better and your readers are not that stupid.
J. Mueller
Taipei
Johnny replies: Thanks for writing, J. My concern with Hung is his personal reactionary politics, not the reactionary politics that got him the job. Political appointments are par for the course, but despite this, media standards and freedoms should be defended. I fear CNA will regress even further.
A Nobel sense of humor
Dear Johnny,
I was reading an Oct. 12 article called “Nobel: Ma Overlooked” by Raoul Heinrichs in The Interpreter, the blog for the Lowy Institute for International Policy.
It says: “Like many people, I tend to think that the decision to pre-emptively award [US] President [Barack] Obama the Nobel Peace prize was a very poor one. ...
“But if not Obama, then whom? To my mind, perhaps the most worthy candidate would have been Ma Ying-jeou [馬英九], president of Taiwan. Since his election in March 2008, Ma has provided the impetus for the most rapid and wide-ranging rapprochement in cross-Strait relations in sixty years.
“Even as Taiwan’s economic growth came to a grinding halt — it grew at 0.1% for most of 2008 — Ma has sustained broad public support for his approach to relations with the mainland, securing Beijing’s tentative cooperation by deferring questions of independence and reunification, and facilitating agreements on, among other things, the establishment of direct charter flights, a diplomatic truce, and new bilateral investment guidelines — all the while conducting his diplomacy in a manner generally conducive to further improvement in relations.”
The bit that I find a bit dodgy is when the article states “Ma has sustained broad public support for his relations with the mainland.” Uggh ... excuse me ... “broad public support”?
So, Johnny, what are your impressions?
Michael Scanlon
East Hartford, Connecticut
Johnny replies: The opinion that Ma deserves a Nobel is not new, but this is the first time I’ve seen it come from a reputable think tank. My humble advice to Mr Heinrichs:
1. Come to Taiwan.
2. Count how many Taiwanese hear this suggestion before someone laughs in your face.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is