The Dec. 5 mayoral and county commissioner elections were a fight for local government leadership. However, because of the central government’s poor performance, many also viewed the elections as a confidence vote for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration. In the elections, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) secured 12 seats, but KMT Yilan County Commissioner Lu Guo-hwa (呂國華) was defeated by 20,925 votes despite Ma’s 11 visits to Yilan before the election. If not for the government’s poor performance, the KMT would have won this seat easily.
Seven KMT mayors and commissioners were running for re-election. Most KMT mayors and commissioners were easily re-elected, partly because they were incumbents, and partly because the KMT has a tight grip on local politics. The remaining seven cities and counties already ruled by the KMT included two outlying island groups — Kinmen and Lienchiang counties — and Hualien and Taitung counties on the east coast. Traditionally, these have been the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) weakest areas.
The real battleground, then, was Hsinchu City and County and Taoyuan County. In these areas, the DPP’s candidates were chosen without adequate planning.
Four years ago, the KMT candidate for Taoyuan County, Eric Chu (朱立倫), easily defeated the DPP candidate, Cheng Pao-ching (鄭寶清). When the DPP nominated former Government Information Office minister Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) in October, he was expected to suffer a more miserable defeat against the KMT’s candidate, Legislator John Wu (吳志揚), who is from a powerful local political family. Surprisingly however, Wu, the son of former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄), only won the election by about 50,000 votes, an embarrassment to the Wu family.
Chiayi Mayor and Vice KMT Chairwoman Huang Min-hui (黃敏惠), who Ma relies on heavily, only defeated DPP legislator-at-large Twu Shiing-jer (涂醒哲), who had no election experience, by just a little over 8,000 votes. In Penghu County, where the KMT has always won, the two parties had a very close battle, and the KMT’s Wang Chien-fa (王乾發) in the end managed the slimmest of victories with less than 600 votes. Even more surprising, the DPP’s Liu Ti-hao (劉櫂豪) received 38.23 percent of the total vote when running for Taitung commissioner four years ago, but this time that figure increased sharply to 47.41 percent.
The election results can be seen as a warning to the KMT. Although the party suffered serious internal splits in several districts such as Hsinchu, Hualien and Kinmen counties, they were not the main cause of the party’s declining vote. The president’s unclear role, ineffective leadership, self-imposed isolation, opaque operations, overlapping decisions, ignorance of public opinion and loose government units are all big problems.
Unexpectedly, Ma appointed former Taipei deputy mayor King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) as KMT secretary-general to further tighten control of the party. Despite the fact that King is good at strategy and propaganda, this will be ineffective without substantial political accomplishments.
King’s appointment also makes us wonder whether Ma will use reform as an excuse to centralize power. That being so, his decision-making body will become smaller and include people of similar backgrounds.
How then can they possibly understand grassroots thinking?
Hawang Shiow-duan is a professor of political science at Soochow University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS